WRIT PETITION NO. 2320 OF 2018
4 Feb 2019The matter arises from a writ petition filed by Mandhana Industries Ltd, a public limited company engaged in textile manufacturing, against an order o...
Search Results for "revisional order"
2520 result(s) found
Found 2520 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Vacancy Dispute — Revision Against Vacancy Order Held Maintainable Despite Earlier Writ Dismissal. The Court held that an order notifying vacancy is only a step in the process of allotment and can be challenged along with the final order under Section 18 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972.
1 Jan 2020The appeal arises from a rent control dispute concerning House No.61/8, Ground Floor, Green Pasture View, Landhour Bazar, Mussoorie. Rashid Ahmed was ...
- 319
High Court
High Court Directs Revisional Authority to Consider Revision Petition Within Six Weeks in Site Allotment Cancellation Case. Mandamus issued under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for consideration of revision petition under Section 63 of Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987.
13 Aug 2021The petitioner, Mr. N. Harish, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Ben...
- 156
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Non-Speaking Order of Central Government in Excise Revision and Remands for Fresh Decision. Government's Rejection of Revision Under Section 36 of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, Without Reasons, Held Invalid as It Failed to Provide Judicial Consideration and Disclosure of Materials.
28 Oct 1969The case arose from a dispute over excise duty liability on a chemical compound produced by the appellant company, which the authorities classified as...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Part, Holds Revision Under Section 34(4) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Maintainable Against Order Under Section 29(2). The court ruled that an order dismissing a tenant's application for restoration of electricity supply is a 'decree' under the Act, making revision maintainable.
12 Aug 2022The appellant, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Co-operative Society Limited, is the owner of premises occupied by respondent No.1, Narendra Mohanlal Choudhary, as...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order Allocating Government Land to Army Havaldar. The court upheld the revisional authority's decision under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, finding no error in granting the land to the respondent.
16 Dec 2019The petitioners, fourteen residents of village Gosarane, taluka Kalwan, district Nashik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 639 Days Delay in Rent Revision. Revisional Authority Lacks Jurisdiction to Extend Limitation Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
11 Feb 2015The petitioner, Naranji Bhimji Family Trust, challenged an order dated 10.09.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division (Revisional A...
- 126
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Civil Revision Petitions Challenging Interlocutory Orders Rejecting Applications Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Commercial Suit. Revisions Under Section 115 CPC Barred by Section 8 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and Counterclaim Against Co-Defendant Maintainable if It Concerns Plaintiff’s Rights.
25 Nov 2025The High Court of Karnataka dealt with two civil revision petitions arising out of commercial suits filed by HDFC Bank Ltd. (plaintiff) against a borr...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Revisionary Powers Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act — Concurrent Jurisdiction and Single Exercise of Power. The court held that Section 154(1) does not confer concurrent jurisdiction on the Registrar and State Government, and the revisional power can be exercised only once.
21 Apr 2011The Bombay High Court, in a common judgment, addressed two sets of questions of law referred by a learned single Judge concerning Section 154 of the M...
- 275
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Revisional Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The Labour Court's findings of fact, based on evidence, cannot be interfered with in revision without a finding of perversity or jurisdictional error.
14 Aug 2017The petitioner, Raju Purushottam Warurkar, was employed as a printer with the respondent firm, Bokey Printers, from 1985, with confirmation in 1987. O...
- 93
