Search Results for "redetermination"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Reconsideration of Section 28A Application Without Certified Copy in Land Acquisition Case. The court held that the requirement of certified copy is directory and the authority should have given an opportunity to produce it.

The petitioner, Tukaram Janaba Patil, aged 96, owned agricultural lands in Gut no.1274 and 1277 at Village Kalkundri, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Petitioners Entitled to Rental Compensation Under Government Resolutions for Possession Taken Before Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioners, including The Ichalkaranji Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd. and Sou. Kishori P. Awade and others, filed writ petitions challenging a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Motor Accident Claim - Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 72,400 to Rs. 1,00,000 for Permanent Disability. Tribunal's Assessment of 10% Disability Upheld as Reasonable, but Additional Heads of Compensation Awarded.

The appellant, Ashok Baliramji Bramhne, filed a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Underestimation of Permanent Disability. Claimant's 50% Disability Recognized Based on Medical Certificate, Award Increased from Rs. 72,400 to Rs. 1,44,800.

The appellant, Ashok Baliramji Bramhne, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Third Member Reference and Remand Ambiguity. The court held that the third member cannot go beyond the referred question and the remand order was ambiguous, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-...