Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Claim for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Petitioners Entitled to Rental Compensation Under Government Resolutions for Possession Taken Before Acquisition Proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, including The Ichalkaranji Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd. and Sou. Kishori P. Awade and others, filed writ petitions challenging a land acquisition award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. However, during hearings, they restricted their claim solely to rental compensation under Government Resolutions dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979, and 14th June 2001, along with arrears and interest at 15% per annum. The court noted that the possession of land was taken before initiation of acquisition proceedings, and the petitioners had applied to the SubDivisional Officer for rental compensation. The court allowed the petitions, directing the respondents to pay rental compensation with arrears and interest.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Rental Compensation - Government Resolutions - Petitioners challenged land acquisition award but restricted claim to rental compensation under G.R. dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979, and 14th June 2001 - Court considered entitlement to rental compensation for possession taken before acquisition proceedings - Held that petitioners are entitled to rental compensation with arrears and interest at 15% per annum (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to rental compensation under Government Resolutions dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979, and 14th June 2001 for land possession taken before initiation of acquisition proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petitions allowed. Respondents directed to pay rental compensation under Government Resolutions dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979, and 14th June 2001 with arrears and interest at 15% per annum.

Law Points

  • Rental compensation
  • Government Resolution
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Possession before acquisition
  • Interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 52

Writ Petition No. 13464 of 2017 with Writ Petition No. 13476 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 13477 of 2017

2019-01-31

R.M. BORDE, V.L. ACHLIYA

Mr. Prashant Bhavake for Petitioner, Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 – State, Mr. N.P. Deshpande for Respondent No.4

The Ichalkaranji Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd. and Sou. Kishori P. Awade and ors.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging land acquisition award, later restricted to claim for rental compensation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought rental compensation under Government Resolutions dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979, and 14th June 2001 with arrears and interest at 15% per annum.

Filing Reason

Possession of land was taken before initiation of acquisition proceedings, entitling petitioners to rental compensation.

Issues

Whether petitioners are entitled to rental compensation under Government Resolutions for possession taken before acquisition proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that possession was taken before acquisition proceedings, thus entitled to rental compensation under Government Resolutions.

Ratio Decidendi

Petitioners are entitled to rental compensation under Government Resolutions for land possession taken before initiation of acquisition proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

the petitioners do not want to agitate the grievance as regards the challenge to the award already declared by the Land Acquisition Officer and would restrict its claim only so far as the claim relating to grant of rental compensation payable to the petitioners under the Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 1st December 1972, 2nd July 1979 and 14th June 2001 with all the arrears together with interest at the rate of 15% per annum.

Procedural History

Petitions filed challenging land acquisition award; during hearing, petitioners restricted claim to rental compensation; court allowed petitions with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process Order Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts of Demanding Permission to Put Up Society Board Held to Be in Discharge of Official Duty, Requiring Prior Sanction.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Acquittal of Husband and Mother-in-law for Offences Under Sections 498A, 304B, 302 r/w 34 IPC and Sect...