Search Results for "qualifying marks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "qualifying marks"

205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Pension Case — Temporary Service Counted for Pension. Break in Service Does Not Forfeit Past Service Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

7 Apr 2026

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against a Single Judge order dated 18.03.2024, which directed the counting of temp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Minimum Qualifying Marks in Viva-Voce for Judicial Appointments — Rule 41 of Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010 Upheld. The Court held that prescribing a minimum benchmark of 25% marks in interview for District Judge (Direct Recruitment) is neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, and the challenge became academic due to subsequent amendments.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Manoj Goyal, an advocate aspiring to be appointed as an Additional District Judge in Rajasthan, challenged the constitutional validity ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Disabled Candidates in Rajasthan Judicial Services Recruitment — Horizontal Reservation Does Not Require Separate Cut-Off Marks for Persons with Benchmark Disabilities. The Court held that in overall horizontal reservation, candidates with disabilities must meet the cut-off of their vertical category; no separate cut-off is mandated under the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, 2010.

27 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Rekha Sharma and Ratan Lal against the Rajasthan High Court's rejection of their writ petitions...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.

20 Jan 2022

This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds University Ordinance on MBBS Exam Revaluation — Regulation 5 of RGUHS Ordinance dated 01.02.2021 held valid and not violative of Article 14. The court found that the ordinance prescribing a uniform revaluation fee and procedure was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory.

17 Dec 2021

The petitioners, Vishweshwara C and Shashank S. Reddy, were first-year MBBS students at Srinivas Institute of Medical Sciences and Vydehi Institute of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows OBC Female Candidates in UP Police Constable Recruitment to Be Considered Against General Category Vacancies. Horizontal Reservation Principle Requires Uniform Application of Cut-off Marks Across Genders, and Candidates with Higher Marks Than General Category Cut-off Cannot Be Denied Selection.

18 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court dealt with a Miscellaneous Application filed by two female candidates, Sonam Tomar (OBC-Female) and Reeta Rani (SC-Female), who part...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows OBC Female Candidates in UP Police Constable Recruitment to Be Selected in General Category Based on Merit. Horizontal Reservation Principle Applied Equally to Female Candidates, Directing State to Consider OBC Females Scoring Above General Female Cut-Off.

18 Dec 2020

The case pertains to a Miscellaneous Application filed by Ms. Sonam Tomar (OBC-Female) and Ms. Reeta Rani (SC-Female) who participated in the 2013 sel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Non-Selection for District Judge Posts — Selection Process Upheld as Valid Under Article 233 and Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2004. The court found no arbitrariness in the non-selection of the petitioners, who were advocates and Assistant Public Prosecutors, as the selection committee followed the prescribed procedure.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by candidates who were not selected for appointment a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Non-Selection of Assistant Public Prosecutors for District Judge Posts. Selection process upheld as valid under Article 233 and Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2004.

7 Feb 2019

The petitioners, Sri. Dhanesh Mugali and three others, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging their non-selec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes University Notification Requiring Minimum 50% Marks in Each Theory Paper for MD Dermatology Examination — Directs Fresh Valuation of Answer Scripts. University Cannot Impose Additional Eligibility Criteria Beyond MCI Regulations; Notification Dated 1.7.2015 Held Arbitrary and Illegal.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Dr. Haritha Ravipati and Mr. Mamidi Varun, were postgraduate medical students who appeared for the MD Dermatology examination conduct...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)