Search Results for "promoter obligations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "promoter obligations"

300 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 300 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoters' Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA — Upholds Competent Authority's Order Including Recreational Ground Area. The Court held that the Competent Authority's order under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was valid and the petitioners' objections regarding excess land and right of way were not sustainable.

24 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd., Rajesh Himatlal, and Wonder Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.

2 May 2025

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance and Cooperative Society Registration. Registration of Tenants Coownership Cooperative Housing Society under Section 12(1) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 is valid despite prior declaration under Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970.

19 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Rahul Enterprises, a proprietary concern engaged in development and construction, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in MOFA Dispute Over Common Areas and Parking Rights. Developer restrained from constructing on open space and selling car parks as they are common facilities under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

24 Jun 2013

The dispute arises from a development project known as Phoenix Towers in Parel, Mumbai. The appellants, Phoenix Construction Company and another, are ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Lack of Notice to Original Landowner Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Deemed Conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA cannot be granted without affording opportunity of hearing to the developer who is not a member of the society.

4 Oct 2023

The petitioners, M/s. K.G. Associates (developer) and its partner, challenged an order dated 17 March 2020 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operat...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

21 Dec 2018

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

9 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

4 Mar 2025

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Recall and Review Applications in Bank Loan Assignment Case — Consent Order Recorded on Minutes of Order Cannot Be Unilaterally Recalled. Assignment of Debt and Security by Co-operative Bank to Third Party Under OTS Upheld Despite Subsequent Objections by Liquidator and Suspended Director.

11 Mar 2025

The judgment concerns three applications seeking recall or review of an order dated 21 October 2022 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)