Search Results for "oral mortgage"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Material Evidence and Misreading Documents. Mortgage by Conditional Sale Held Not Extinguished by Mere Delay; Right to Redeem Survives Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant (original plaintiff) filed a suit for redemption of mortgage of a shop in Borsad, Anand. The plaintiff had executed two mortgage by cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses KSFC's Petition to Implead in Specific Performance Suit. Mortgagee is not a necessary party to a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale.

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) filed writ petitions challenging the order of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Cross Appeals in Mortgage Redemption Suit Without Naming Parties. The Court Examines Whether a 1947 Mortgage Was Redeemed by Partial Heirs in 1959, Affecting Rights of Other Co-Heirs.

The present appeals arise from a mortgage redemption suit filed in 1976. The original plaintiffs (legal heirs of the mortgagor) sought redemption of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Enforcement of Security Interest Against Developer and Its Directors Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Trustee Is a 'Secured Creditor' Entitled to Take Possession of Mortgaged Property Despite Pending RERA Proceedings.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, a debenture trustee, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Collector, Pune, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the appellant failed to prove the mortgage and refusal to redeem, and no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Gulabrao Vishwas Desai, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and order dated 3rd August 1988 passed ...