Search Results for "heritage building"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "heritage building"

106 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Basic Toilet Facilities in All Court Premises Under Article 21 — Right to Dignity Includes Access to Sanitation. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to sanitation, and the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to all States and Un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Application Under MOFA — Holds That Competent Authority Cannot Reject Application on Grounds of Missing Documents After Issuing Notice, and That Lack of Occupation Certificate Is Not a Bar to Grant of Deemed Conveyance.

25 Nov 2024

The petitioner, ALJ Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

5 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Notice Under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Is Required Before Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

4 Jul 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by residents of Shirdi challenging the demolition of their structures by the Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Road Construction in Mumbai — Environmental Clearance Upheld. Court holds that the Mumbai Coastal Road Project (South) is a public utility and the Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA is valid under CRZ Notification, 2011, and EIA Notification, 2006.

26 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, a resident of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Environmental Clearance (EC) gra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Expert Appraisal Committee to Revisit Environmental Clearance for Greenfield Airport at Mopa, Goa, Balancing Development and Biodiversity Concerns in Western Ghats. The Court suspends the environmental clearance pending fresh appraisal by the EAC, emphasizing the need to preserve forests, ecologically sensitive areas, and water channels.

23 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court of India was hearing a Miscellaneous Application filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Society Members Challenging Arbitral Award for Lack of Locus Standi. Non-signatories to arbitration agreement cannot challenge award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Dec 2014

The petitioners, who are members of Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition Against Tenant Not Party to Arbitration Agreement. Interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be granted against a third party who is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking int...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

17 Oct 2005

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)