Search Results for "compensation redetermination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "compensation redetermination"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in National Highway Acquisition Compensation Case — District Magistrate Cannot Review SLAO Award Under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956. The power under Section 3G(5) is limited to correction of errors apparent on record and cannot be used to re-determine compensation or review the award on merits.

1 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from a land acquisition proceeding under the National Highways Act, 1956 for widening National Highway No. 29 in District Mau, Uttar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Lack of Evidence. Claimants Failed to Produce Comparable Sales Evidence Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

13 Jan 2026

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Withdrawal from Acquisition Possible Under Madhya Bharat Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. Court Affirms Solatium Payable and Limits High Court's Revision Jurisdiction to Not Re-examine Sufficiency of Compensation Under Sections 305, 387, 392.

6 Sep 1968

These appeals by special leave arose from proceedings for fixation of compensation for land acquired by the Municipal Corporation, Indore under its Ro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhancement for Agricultural Land Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Court holds that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under Section 23(1A) and Section 23(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and that the acquired land was agricultural, not non-agricultural, entitling the claimants to higher compensation.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Bhagirathibai Shivgonda Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Reference ...

High Court

Madras High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging Sale Notice and Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Dispute Involves Lands Acquired for Namakkal Neighbourhood Scheme, with Compensation Deposited in Court and Possession Allegedly Taken, Raising Question of Applicability of Section 24(2).

12 Mar 2025

The matter pertained to two writ petitions filed before the Madras High Court by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Namakkal Neighbourhood S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Reconsideration of Section 28A Application Without Certified Copy in Land Acquisition Case. The court held that the requirement of certified copy is directory and the authority should have given an opportunity to produce it.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Tukaram Janaba Patil, aged 96, owned agricultural lands in Gut no.1274 and 1277 at Village Kalkundri, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Redetermination Under Section 28-A Permissible Based on High Court Judgment in Same Acquisition. The Court held that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is a beneficent provision and an application for redetermination can be filed within three months from the date of the appellate court's judgment if it is the first determination in the acquisition.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Banwari and others against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had set aside the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application for Enhanced Compensation — Land Acquisition Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Limitation Provisions. The court held that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was within limitation and the rejection without hearing violated natural justice.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of Balwant Kannav, challenged the order dated 31.03.1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Application. Petitioner's ignorance of appeal decision held sufficient cause for delay under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

13 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Parasmal Jain, was a landowner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Upper Wainganga Project. An award under Sec...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)