Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"

1662 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1662 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

1 Nov 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Commercial Arbitration Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award on Royalty Liability for Earthwork. Liability for Royalty on Ordinary Earth Used in Embankment Held by Arbitral Tribunal to be Borne by Employer, Section 34 Petition Filed Challenging Interpretation of Contract Clauses.

14 Nov 2025

The matter involved a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to a majority arbitral award dated 22nd May 2020 arisin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

19 Jan 2026

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal's Order Automatically Vacating Stay in Land Dispute — Asian Resurfacing Principle Not Applicable to Revenue Tribunals Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The court held that the automatic vacation of interim stay after six months under Asian Resurfacing applies only to CPC and criminal proceedings, not to revenue tribunals under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

18 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Devsing Ramchandra Chavan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23 June 2021 passed by the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 37 Petition Against Arbitral Tribunal’s Order Permitting Premises Inspection in a Specific Performance Dispute. The Arbitral Tribunal’s Direction Under Section 17 Was Challenged as Beyond Scope and Unnecessary, Raising Questions on Interim Measures for Evidence Gathering Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Feb 2019

The case involved two arbitration petitions filed by Raymond Limited under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Stay Order in Cenvat Credit Dispute. Tribunal's Detailed Findings at Stay Stage Prejudge the Appeal and Are Impermissible.

4 Mar 2015

The appellant, CEAT Limited, filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th June 2014 passed by the Customs, Excise and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding that High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Re-evaluating Factual Determinations.

21 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 30th April 2015, which was rendered in appeals under Section 37 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim by Treating Petition Under Section 166 Instead of Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants entitled to just compensation based on actual income and future prospects, not structured formula.

6 Dec 2021

The appellants, being the widow, minor children, and father of the deceased Diwakar Pawade, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Reinstatement Order in Service Dispute - Penalty of Dismissal Set Aside as Disproportionate to Misconduct of Signing Nomination Form. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct of signing a nomination form as Principal, and reinstatement with back wages was justified.

23 Nov 2022

The petitioners, a trust and its college principal, challenged an order of the University and College Tribunal which set aside the dismissal of respon...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)