Search Results for "Section 100 CPC"

1669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where findings are based on appreciation of evidence and no perversity is shown.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellants (original defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Permanent Injunction Against Defendants Upheld as No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC.

The original plaintiff, Smt. Anusayabai Bapuji Chandramore, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 1097 of 1995 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which confirmed the trial court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Invalid Substituted Service. Court holds that permission for substituted service under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC requires satisfaction that defendant is avoiding service, and mere non-service is insufficient.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Ramesh Jagannath Ingole, against the judgment of the first appellate court which al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and appellate courts' dismissal of suit for declaration of ownership and injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs and some defendants against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Ahmednag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence on Title and Possession.

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the original plaintiff Bajirao Amrit Shinde (since deceased,...