Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Order Cancelling Postponement of APMC Elections and Appointment of Administrator. Government's Action Held Arbitrary for Ignoring Court's Earlier Direction to Hold Village-Level Society Elections First Under Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

2 Mar 2010

The petitioners, comprising the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Ralegaon, its Vice-Chairman, and an agriculturist, challenged two orders:...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeal Challenging Single Judge Order on RTI Act Applicability to APMC. The appeal raises the question whether Agricultural Produce Market Committee is a public authority under Section 2(h) RTI Act.

29 Oct 2010

Background: The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Arvi, challenging an order of the State I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against APMC Dismissal Due to Alternative Remedy of Second Appeal Under Rule 104 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967. Court holds that Rule 103 prescribes procedure for imposing penalties under Rule 102, and appeal lies under Rule 104, not Section 52B of the Act.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantaram Sonawane, an employee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Jalgaon, was dismissed from service. He filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Market Fee Levy on Tobacco Products Under APMC Act — Tobacco Products Held Not Exempt as 'Manufactured Product' Under Section 2(1)(a) of Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939. Processing of tobacco into chewing tobacco or gutka does not transform it into a manufactured product; market fee is leviable.

24 Apr 2006

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by companies and their shareholders challenging the levy of market fee on tobacco products under the Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC Executive Committee for Violation of Natural Justice — Order Passed Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 77(5) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Invalid. The Court held that the power under Section 77(5) is quasi-judicial and requires compliance with principles of natural justice, including a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing.

24 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Santosh Tale, a member of the Executive Committee of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Khamgaon, challenged an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging APMC License Cancellation for Non-Renewal — Licensee Cannot Claim Right to Automatic Renewal Without Compliance with Statutory Conditions. The court held that renewal of license under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is not automatic and APMC has discretion to refuse renewal if conditions are not satisfied.

19 Mar 2024

The petitioners, seven individuals, were licensees of the Mumbai Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure

16 Jan 2018

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Traders' Challenge to Market Fee Levy Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 — Fees Held Valid for Services Rendered by APMC. The court upheld the show cause notice demanding payment of fees for market services, rejecting the contention that the fee was not for services rendered to each licensee.

1 Feb 2005

The petitioners, who are traders in agricultural produce and licence holders within the market area of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)