Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Order Cancelling Postponement of APMC Elections and Appointment of Administrator. Government's Action Held Arbitrary for Ignoring Court's Earlier Direction to Hold Village-Level Society Elections First Under Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, comprising the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Ralegaon, its Vice-Chairman, and an agriculturist, challenged two orders: (1) the State Government's order dated 6-1-2010 cancelling an earlier order that had postponed elections to the APMC, and directing that elections be held immediately; and (2) the consequential order dated 8-1-2010 by the District Deputy Registrar appointing an Administrator for the APMC. The APMC was constituted for five years, with its first meeting on 26-4-2004 and term expiring on 25-6-2009. The Government had earlier exercised power under Section 14(3-A) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 to postpone elections for six months until 25-12-2009, as elections to 25 village-level Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies had not been held. The High Court, by order dated 24-11-2009, had directed that those society elections be held before APMC elections. On 23-12-2009, the Government issued another order postponing elections from 26-12-2009 for six months, citing the Director of Marketing's opinion and the Court's direction. However, on 6-1-2010, the Government cancelled that postponement and directed immediate elections, leading to the appointment of an Administrator. The petitioners argued that the cancellation was arbitrary and contrary to the Court's earlier direction. The Court found that the Government's order of 6-1-2010 was passed without considering the earlier Court direction and the necessity of holding society elections first. The Court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and quashed both the order cancelling postponement and the consequential appointment of Administrator. The Court directed that the earlier order of postponement dated 23-12-2009 shall stand, and elections to the APMC shall be held only after the society elections are completed as per the Court's earlier direction.

Headnote

A) Agricultural Law - APMC Elections - Postponement - Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 - The State Government had postponed elections to APMC for six months due to non-completion of elections to 25 village-level Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies. The Court had earlier directed that society elections be held before APMC elections. The Government later cancelled the postponement and directed immediate elections. Held that the cancellation was arbitrary and contrary to the Court's earlier direction; the earlier postponement order was valid and necessary to ensure proper electoral process. (Paras 2-6)

B) Agricultural Law - Administrator Appointment - Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 - Consequent to the cancellation of postponement, the District Deputy Registrar appointed an Administrator for the APMC. Held that since the cancellation of postponement was invalid, the appointment of Administrator also cannot be sustained. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government's order dated 6-1-2010 cancelling the earlier postponement of elections to the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Ralegaon and directing immediate elections is valid, and whether the consequential order appointing an Administrator is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The order dated 6-1-2010 passed by respondent No.1 and the consequential order dated 8-1-2010 passed by respondent No.2 are quashed and set aside. The order dated 23-12-2009 postponing elections shall stand. Elections to the APMC shall be held only after the elections to the Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies are completed as directed by this Court on 24-11-2009.

Law Points

  • Elections to Agricultural Produce Market Committee must be preceded by elections to village-level Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies
  • Section 14(3-A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act
  • 1963
  • Government's power to postpone elections must be exercised reasonably and not arbitrarily
  • Court's earlier direction to hold society elections first must be complied with
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (03) 184

Writ Petition No. 139 of 2010

2010-03-02

S.A. Bobde, Smt. Vasanti A. Naik

Mr. Subhash Paliwal for petitioners, Mr. Ravi Kadam, Advocate General with Mrs. B.H. Dangre for respondents 1 and 2, Mr. A.M. Ghare for intervenor

Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Ralegaon; Prashant s/o Amrutrao Tayade; Sudhir s/o Ramdasji Javade

The State of Maharashtra; The District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Yavatmal; Prafulla s/o Khushalrao Mankar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging Government orders cancelling postponement of APMC elections and appointing Administrator.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 6-1-2010 cancelling postponement and order dated 8-1-2010 appointing Administrator.

Filing Reason

The Government arbitrarily cancelled the earlier postponement of elections despite Court's direction to hold village-level society elections first.

Previous Decisions

High Court order dated 24-11-2009 directing that elections to Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies be held before APMC elections.

Issues

Whether the State Government's order dated 6-1-2010 cancelling the postponement of APMC elections is valid. Whether the consequential appointment of Administrator is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the cancellation was arbitrary and contrary to the Court's earlier direction to hold society elections first. Respondents argued that the postponement was no longer necessary.

Ratio Decidendi

The Government's power to postpone elections under Section 14(3-A) must be exercised reasonably and in consonance with Court directions. Cancelling a valid postponement without considering the necessity of holding village-level society elections first is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have challenged the order dated 6-1-2010 passed by the respondent No.1-the State of Maharashtra by which the earlier order postponing the elections to the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Ralegaon has been cancelled and the elections are directed to be held. The Court by an order dated 24-11-2009 held that the elections to the Agricultural Seva Sahakari Societies should be held before the elections to the A.P.M.C. are declared. The order dated 6-1-2010 cancelling the earlier order of postponement is arbitrary and cannot be sustained.

Procedural History

The APMC term expired on 25-6-2009. Government postponed elections for six months under Section 14(3-A). High Court on 24-11-2009 directed society elections first. Government on 23-12-2009 again postponed elections for six months. On 6-1-2010, Government cancelled postponement and directed elections. On 8-1-2010, Administrator appointed. Petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 139 of 2010 challenging both orders.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963: Section 14(3-A)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Intention to Cause Death.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes State Government's Order Cancelling Postponement of APMC Elections and Appointment of Administrator. Government's Action Held Arbitrary for Ignoring Court's Earlier Direction to Hold Village-Level Society Elections First Und...