Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Traders' Petition Challenging Deletion of Names from APMC Voters List. Election Authority's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice as Petitioners Were Not Heard Before Removal from Provisional Voters List.

The petitioners, who are traders, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by respondent no. 2, the election authority, deleting 512 names fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Election Programme After Notification Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Shamrao Narhari Pavale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the election process of the Agricultural Produc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Vice-Chairman of APMC Challenging Removal Under Section 45(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Show Cause Notice and Removal Order Quashed for Being Vague and Non-Speaking, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, an elected Director and Vice-Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC), Dhamangaon Railway, challenged an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders of District Deputy Registrar in Election Nomination Dispute. Requirement of Declaration Under Rule 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Held Mandatory.

The petitioner, Gyanba s/o Trimbakrao Shirale, challenged the orders of the District Deputy Registrar, Parbhani, which allowed appeals filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of APMC Chairman Challenging Removal — Show-Cause Notice Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act Must Specify Charges. Removal Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice as Notice Was Vague and No Proper Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, was a member and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur. He was served with a show-c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Chairman in APMC Removal Case — Notice Issued by In-charge Officer Without Authority Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur, challenged a show-cause notice dated 2.6.201...