Bombay High Court Allows Traders' Petition Challenging Deletion of Names from APMC Voters List. Election Authority's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice as Petitioners Were Not Heard Before Removal from Provisional Voters List.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are traders, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by respondent no. 2, the election authority, deleting 512 names from the provisional voters list of the traders constituency of the APMC, Jalgaon. The petitioners contended that the deletion was done without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the order was passed without affording any hearing to the petitioners. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the election authority to restore the names of the petitioners in the provisional voters list. The court further directed that if the election authority intends to delete any names, it must follow the procedure of issuing notice and providing an opportunity of hearing. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Deletion of Names from Voters List - The election authority deleted names of 512 traders from the provisional voters list of the APMC traders constituency without issuing any notice or providing an opportunity of hearing to the affected traders. The court held that such deletion without hearing violates principles of natural justice and the order is liable to be set aside. (Paras 3-5)

B) Election Law - APMC Act - Voters List - Provisional List - The deletion of names from the provisional voters list of the APMC traders constituency by the election authority was challenged. The court found that the order was passed without any notice to the petitioners and without affording them an opportunity of hearing, which is a fundamental requirement of natural justice. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election authority could delete names of traders from the provisional voters list of the APMC traders constituency without giving them an opportunity of hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the election authority to restore the names of the petitioners in the provisional voters list. The court further directed that if the election authority intends to delete any names, it must follow the procedure of issuing notice and providing an opportunity of hearing. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Election law
  • APMC Act
  • Voters list deletion
  • Provisional list
  • Traders constituency
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 14

Writ Petition No.511 of 2023

2023-03-27

Arun R. Pedneker, J.

Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. A. D. Sonkawade i/b. Mr. A. V. Hon, Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, Mr. V. H. Dighe, Mr. V. B. Patil, Mr. G. V. Wani, Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. S. R. Sapkal

Ankita Gaurav Mungad and Others

The State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging deletion of names from provisional voters list of APMC traders constituency.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the order deleting their names from the provisional voters list and restoration of their names.

Filing Reason

The election authority deleted 512 names from the provisional voters list without giving any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

Issues

Whether the election authority can delete names from the provisional voters list without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected persons.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the deletion was done without any notice or hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents did not dispute the lack of hearing but may have justified the deletion on other grounds (not specified in text).

Ratio Decidendi

Deletion of names from a provisional voters list without giving an opportunity of hearing to the affected persons violates principles of natural justice and is liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition, the petitioners have taken objection to the order passed by respondent no.2 – election authority deleting 512 names of the traders from the provisional voters list of the traders constituency of the APMC – Jalgaon. The order has been passed without any notice to the petitioners and without affording them an opportunity of hearing.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the order of the election authority deleting their names from the provisional voters list. The court heard the matter and passed the judgment on 27.03.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Traders' Petition Challenging Deletion of Names from APMC Voters List. Election Authority's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice as Petitioners Were Not Heard Before Removal from Provisional Voters List.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Offenders Act Case — Lack of Proximate Link Between Past Crimes and Public Order Disturbance. Single Pending Murder Case Insufficient to Justify 'Goonda' Detention When Bail Already Gran...