Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6382 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6382 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 55 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and Quashing of Criminal Proceedings. Petition raises grounds of legislative competence, inconsistency with Indian Easements Act, 1882, and limitation under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 468.

19 Dec 2017

This criminal writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Jalgaon to Aurangabad on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's Convenience and Safety Given Paramount Consideration Under Section 24 CPC in Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition for Annulment.

21 Mar 2013

The applicant wife filed a Misc. Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition N...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench hears multiple writ petitions concerning cooperative society elections.

1 Jan 1970

The provided text comprises the cause titles of multiple writ petitions (WP Nos. 8765/2009, 8767/2009, 8768/2009, 8769/2009, 8770/2009, 8782/2009, 878...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Agriculturalists Against State of Maharashtra and Land Acquisition Authorities. Petitions Pertain to Land Acquisition for Irrigation Projects, with Petitioners Seeking Relief from Acquisition Proceedings.

1 Jan 1970

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by agriculturalists from various districts in Mahar...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicates Group of Writ Petitions Filed by Teachers Seeking Relief in Service Matters Against School Management and State Authorities. The Petitions Involve Employees of Various Schools Including Swami Vivekanand Academy and Gyan Mata Vidyavihar in Aurangabad and Nanded Regions Respectively.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Acquittal and Conviction in Wife's Burn Death Case. The Appeals Arise from Trial Court Verdict Convicting Husband for Murder Under Section 302 IPC While Acquitting Him and In-Laws of Dowry Harassment.

14 Aug 2015

Background: This matter involves three criminal appeals before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising from the judgment of the Additional Se...

High Court

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4168 OF 2012

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

2 Aug 2018

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Promotion Order in Family Court Registrar Case — Seniority Subject to Fitness Misinterpreted. Rule 3(a) of the Registrar of the Family Courts (Recruitment) Rules, 1995 mandates promotion based on seniority subject to fitness, not comparative merit; supersession of senior employee without finding of unfitness is illegal.

24 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Shweta Takalgavankar, a Superintendent at the Family Court, Aurangabad, challenged the promotion of respondent no.5, Smt. Asha Ba...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)