High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Agriculturalists Against State of Maharashtra and Land Acquisition Authorities. Petitions Pertain to Land Acquisition for Irrigation Projects, with Petitioners Seeking Relief from Acquisition Proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, heard a batch of writ petitions filed by agriculturalists from various districts in Maharashtra against the State of Maharashtra and various land acquisition authorities. The petitions challenged land acquisition proceedings initiated for irrigation projects. The petitioners were represented by advocates G.S. Patil, B.S. Karhale, and others, while the respondents were represented by Assistant Government Pleaders. No substantive judgment or order was passed in the extracted text; only cause titles and appearances are recorded.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 3498 OF 2012

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (04) 12

Writ Petition No. 3498 of 2012 along with connected writ petitions (Nos. 3499-3523 of 2012)

G.S. Patil, B.S. Karhale, Bhagyashree S. Karhale for petitioners; A.V. Gondhalekar, S.B. Pulkundwar for respondents

Ashok s/o Chandrabhan Aagle and others

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary Irrigation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions filed by agriculturalists challenging land acquisition proceedings by State authorities.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seeking relief against land acquisition (specifics not mentioned)

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed and listed together for hearing before the High Court. Advocates for both sides appeared.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Discharges Contemnors in Contempt Petition Due to Compliance with Order Approving Teacher Appointment. The Court found that the Educational Authorities had approved the appointment of the petitioner teacher as B.T. Assistant (Maths)...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Murder of a Minor Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the last seen together theory coupled with medical evidence and motive established guilt beyond reasonable doubt un...