Case Note & Summary
The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions challenged orders of recovery passed by various Collectors, Deputy Collectors, and Tahsildars under revenue laws. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates, and the State was represented by Assistant Government Pleaders. The court considered the petitions together. However, the provided judgment text does not include the substantive part of the order, including the legal issues, arguments, or decision. Therefore, the outcome and reasoning remain unknown. The document was uploaded on 2018-08-02, likely the date of pronouncement.
Issue of Consideration
(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4258 OF 2018
Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration
Subscribe Now
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Central Excise Special Duty Case — Goods Manufactured Before Levy Date Not Liable. Special excise duty under Section 37 of Finance Act, 1978 Is a Levy on Manufacture or Production, Not Removal; Cigarettes ...
2026-09-18 03:34:41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Upholds Ownership but Modifies Compensation Sharing. High Court's direction to share 30% compensation with unauthorized allottees set aside as owner cannot be forced to share compens...
2026-09-18 03:34:32
