Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extracted text.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions challenged orders of recovery passed by various Collectors, Deputy Collectors, and Tahsildars under revenue laws. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates, and the State was represented by Assistant Government Pleaders. The court considered the petitions together. However, the provided judgment text does not include the substantive part of the order, including the legal issues, arguments, or decision. Therefore, the outcome and reasoning remain unknown. The document was uploaded on 2018-08-02, likely the date of pronouncement.

Issue of Consideration

(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4258 OF 2018

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 21

Writ Petition No. 4258 of 2018 with connected petitions (4258/2018, 5124/2018, 5265/2018, 5266/2018, 5267/2018, 5268/2018, 5269/2018, 5270/2018, 5366/2018, 5369/2018, 5440/2018, 5441/2018, 5495/2018, 5507/2018, 6839/2018, 6840/2018, 6841/2018, 6842/2018, 6946/2018, 6950/2018, 7049/2018, 7057/2018, 7059/2018)

2018-08-02

Mr. S.G. Dodya, Mr. P.N. Mule, Mr. P.N. Kutti, Mr. A.B. Kharosekar, Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, Mr. S.G. Jadhavar, Mr. A.B. Girase, Mr. K.S. Chavan, Mr. M.P. Kale, Mr. S.K. Chavan, Mr. V.S. Badakh, Mr. L.C. Patil, Mr. S.M. Ganachari, Mr. S.S. Dande, Mr. G.K. NaikThigle, Mr. S.J. Salunke

Dhannu s/o Vitthal Phapal and others

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by revenue authorities.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed and grouped for common hearing before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court. The matter was uploaded on 02/08/2018.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad Adjudicated a Group of 23 Writ Petitions Against Revenue Authorities. The petitions challenged recovery orders issued by Collectors and Tahsildars, but the substantive judgment content is not present in the extra...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Issues Directions to Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation for Demolition of Illegal Constructions and Grievance Redress. Court Takes Judicial Notice of Large-Scale Illegal RCC Buildings and Corporation's Inaction, Directing Surve...