Case Note & Summary
The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad heard a batch of 23 writ petitions filed by individuals against State revenue authorities. The petitions challenged orders of recovery passed by various Collectors, Deputy Collectors, and Tahsildars under revenue laws. The petitioners were represented by multiple advocates, and the State was represented by Assistant Government Pleaders. The court considered the petitions together. However, the provided judgment text does not include the substantive part of the order, including the legal issues, arguments, or decision. Therefore, the outcome and reasoning remain unknown. The document was uploaded on 2018-08-02, likely the date of pronouncement.
Issue of Consideration
(1) WRIT PETITION NO.4258 OF 2018
Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration
Subscribe Now
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.
2026-11-02 10:50:46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition in Property Dispute — Second Appeal Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918 Does Not Require Substantial Question of Law. The Court restored the High Court's judgment after finding that the original judgment...
2026-11-02 10:50:39
