ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
Search Results for "Division Bench orders"
10075 result(s) found
Found 10075 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Single Judge Order Quashing CBI Proceedings in IPO Fraud Case, Remands to Division Bench for Fresh Hearing on Maintainability. The Court held that the Single Judge ought to have considered whether the petitions were maintainable before him in light of the High Court Rules and the earlier Division Bench order dismissing a similar petition.
1 Jan 2024The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against an order of the Bombay High Court's Single Judge quash...
- 474
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.
19 Nov 2025Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Service Bonds for Post-Graduate Medical Courses. The Court held that such bonds are valid and do not violate fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, as they are reasonable restrictions imposed in public interest to ensure availability of doctors in underserved areas.
19 Aug 2019The case involves multiple writ petitions and appeals challenging compulsory bond conditions imposed by various State Governments and the Armed Forces...
- 466
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.
19 Apr 2024The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a wr...
- 112
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Land Acquisition Challenge. The Division Bench considered whether the dismissal of the writ petition on grounds of delay and laches was justified under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.
3 Jan 2023The appeal arises from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged land acquisition notifications issued under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Dev...
- 16
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Recovery of Excess Payments from In-Service Nursing Trainees Under Restitution Principle. Recovery Permitted as Payments Were Made Pursuant to Court Order Later Set Aside, Distinguishing Mistaken Payment Guidelines Under Rafiq Masih Case for Class III and IV Employees.
29 Mar 2022The dispute originated from in-service employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, working as ANMs, Lab Technicians, and similar ...
- 343
High Court
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
- 19
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment with Regular Pay from Date of Appointment, Quashing Fixed Wage Condition. Government Resolution dated 08.05.2006 held inapplicable to compassionate appointments under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2 Mar 2026The petitioner, Alpeshkumar Maheshkumar Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court chall...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.
21 Apr 2022The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...
- 65
