Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college is a government-aided institution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, seven retired employees of Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya (Respondent No. 4), an Ayurvedic college in Solapur, filed a writ petition on 11 January 2018 seeking pensionary benefits and gratuity. They had taken voluntary retirement and were denied these benefits. The petitioners included teaching and non-teaching staff such as a Head Clerk, Clerk, and others. The respondents were the State of Maharashtra (through the Principal Secretary of Medical Education and Drugs Dept. and Education and Employment Dept.), the Directorate of Ayush, and the college itself. The petitioners argued that the college is a government-aided institution and they are entitled to pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The respondents opposed, but the court found that the college receives government aid and the employees are covered under the pension rules. The court held that the petitioners are entitled to pensionary benefits and gratuity, and directed the respondents to compute and pay the amounts within three months from the date of the judgment. The court also ordered that if the benefits are not paid within the stipulated time, interest at 6% per annum would be payable. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pensionary Benefits - Voluntary Retirement - Government-Aided Institutions - The petitioners, employees of a government-aided Ayurvedic college, sought pension and gratuity after taking voluntary retirement. The court held that the college is a government-aided institution and the employees are entitled to pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court directed the respondents to compute and pay the benefits within three months. (Paras 2-10)

B) Service Law - Gratuity - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - The court held that the petitioners are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as the college is covered under the Act. The respondents were directed to pay gratuity along with pensionary benefits. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, who are teaching and non-teaching staff of a government-aided Ayurvedic college and who took voluntary retirement, are entitled to pensionary benefits and gratuity.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to compute and pay the pensionary benefits and gratuity to the petitioners within three months from the date of the judgment. If not paid within that time, interest at 6% per annum shall be payable. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Pensionary benefits
  • Voluntary retirement
  • Government-aided institutions
  • Ayurvedic colleges
  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules
  • 1982
  • Gratuity
  • Payment of Gratuity Act
  • 1972
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 119

WRIT PETITION NO. 4597 OF 2018

2024-04-19

NITIN JAMDAR, M.M. SATHAYE

2024:BHC-AS:18302-DB

Mr.Vishwajeet Sawant, Senior Advocate with Mr.Prabhakar Jadhav for the Petitioners; Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for the Respondent -State; Mr.Kanhaiya S. Yadav h/f. Mr.Neel G. Helekar for Respondent No.4

Sharad Nagnath Bubne and Others

State of Maharashtra and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking pensionary benefits and gratuity for employees who took voluntary retirement from a government-aided Ayurvedic college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to respondents to grant pensionary benefits and gratuity.

Filing Reason

Denial of pensionary benefits and gratuity to employees who took voluntary retirement.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to pensionary benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982? Whether the petitioners are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the college is a government-aided institution and they are entitled to pension and gratuity. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found the college is government-aided and employees covered under pension rules.

Ratio Decidendi

Employees of government-aided Ayurvedic colleges who take voluntary retirement are entitled to pensionary benefits under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, and gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners are teaching and non-teaching staff of Respondent No. 4- Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya, an Ayurvedic College. By this Petition filed on 11 January 2018, the Petitioners are seeking pensionary benefits and gratuity denied to those employees of Ayurvedic Colleges who have taken voluntary retirement.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on 11 January 2018. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith. Respondents waived service. The petition was taken up for disposal on 19 April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982:
  • Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits to Retired Ayurvedic College Staff. Employees who took voluntary retirement are entitled to pension and gratuity under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, as the college...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Proceedings Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Show-Cause Notice and Externment Order Set Aside for Procedural Irregularities and Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that the right to reside...