Search Results for "Second Schedule Income Tax Act"

795 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 795 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Petition Seeking Removal of Executors for Alleged Misconduct and Conflict of Interest in Administration of Estate. Court Hears Submissions on Allegations of Illegal Occupation and Misappropriation of Bequeathed Property.

Background: The dispute arose from the administration of the estate of Ramanlal Gokal, who died on 22nd March 2007 leaving a will dated 25th January 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993

The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Wealth Tax Case Concerning Leasehold Interest in Salt Pans. Precarious Lease Terminable Annually Held Not to Be an 'Asset' Under Section 2(e)(v) of Wealth-tax Act, 1957, as Interest is Available for Period Not Exceeding Six Years from Valuation Date.

The case arose from a wealth tax assessment for the year 1959-60 where the Wealth-tax Officer computed the value of the respondent-assessee's leasehol...