Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representatives of the deceased original plaintiff, seeking withdrawal of Suit No. 1861 of 1984. The suit was originally filed by the deceased plaintiff, and after his death, his legal representatives were brought on record. However, the will of the deceased plaintiff appointed executors, including Sardar Sambhaji Angre and Shri S. Gurumurthy, who were also parties to the suit. The applicants sought to withdraw the suit without the consent of the other executors. The court examined the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court held that the executors of the will are necessary parties to the suit as they represent the estate of the deceased. The applicants, being only some of the legal representatives, could not withdraw the suit without joining all executors. The court dismissed the Notice of Motion, holding that the suit cannot be withdrawn without the consent of all executors.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Withdrawal of Suit - Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC - Legal Representatives - Executors of Will - The applicants, being legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff, sought to withdraw the suit. However, the executors of the will of the deceased plaintiff were necessary parties and had not consented. The court held that the suit could not be withdrawn without joining all executors as parties, as they represent the estate of the deceased. (Paras 1-10)

B) Succession Act - Executor's Role - Section 213 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The executors of the will have a duty to administer the estate and are necessary parties to any proceeding affecting the estate. The court held that the applicants could not unilaterally withdraw the suit without the consent of the other executors. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the legal representatives of a deceased plaintiff, who are also executors of the will, can withdraw the suit without the consent of the other executors who are not parties to the application?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Notice of Motion dismissed. The suit cannot be withdrawn without joining all executors of the will of the deceased plaintiff as parties.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of suit
  • legal representatives
  • executors of will
  • necessary parties
  • Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC
  • Section 213 Indian Succession Act
  • 1925
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-OS:10742

Notice of Motion (L) No. 2482 of 2018 in Suit No. 1861 of 1984

0000-00-00

2019:BHC-OS:10742

Mr. D.J. Khambata, Senior Advocate, a/w. Mr. Zal

H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia

Sardar Sambhaji Angre and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for withdrawal of suit by legal representatives of deceased plaintiff.

Remedy Sought

Applicants sought to withdraw Suit No. 1861 of 1984.

Filing Reason

Applicants claimed they were legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff and wished to withdraw the suit.

Issues

Whether the applicants, as legal representatives, can withdraw the suit without the consent of the executors of the will of the deceased plaintiff?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued they are legal representatives and entitled to withdraw the suit. Respondents (executors) argued they are necessary parties and the suit cannot be withdrawn without their consent.

Ratio Decidendi

Executors of a will are necessary parties to a suit involving the estate of the deceased. Withdrawal of suit by some legal representatives without consent of all executors is not permissible under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC read with Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Judgment Excerpts

The executors of the will are necessary parties to the suit as they represent the estate of the deceased. The applicants cannot unilaterally withdraw the suit without the consent of the other executors.

Procedural History

Suit No. 1861 of 1984 was filed by the original plaintiff. After his death, legal representatives were brought on record. The applicants filed Notice of Motion (L) No. 2482 of 2018 seeking withdrawal of the suit. The court dismissed the motion.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXIII Rule 1
  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 213
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Adverse Possession.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent