COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019
11 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "development agreements"
1460 result(s) found
Found 1460 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.
30 Jan 2015The petitioner, M/s. Prasun Developers, challenged orders of the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Pune, and the Deputy Inspector Gene...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Builder's Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suits — Agreements to Sell Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled. The court held that without a concluded contract, no prima facie case exists for interim injunction under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, M/s Rupji Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in construction business, entered into several agreements to sell with various flat...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeals by Landowners Challenging Slum Dwellers' Protection Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Competent Authority's Classification of Structures as Slums and Occupants' Eligibility Upheld, Affirming Tribunal's Orders.
8 Apr 2005The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard nine Letters Patent Appeals (LPA Nos. 107 to 116 of 1996) involving common questions of law and fact. The...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Members in Cooperative Housing Society Redevelopment Dispute — Majority Decision Upheld. Court holds that minority members cannot stall redevelopment process approved by 80 out of 88 members, and objections regarding additional area do not justify interim injunction.
8 Nov 2023The case involves an appeal by 8 members (appellants) of Neel Shantiniketan Co-operative Housing Society Limited against an order of the City Civil Co...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Appoint Arbitrator in Redevelopment Dispute — Dispute Not Arbitrable Under Section 41(e) of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Termination of Development Agreement and Claim for Possession Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration as They Involve Specific Performance and Continuous Duties.
20 Oct 2015The petitioners, Anand Villa Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and ...
- 117
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Clause Validity Dispute Under Lease Agreement. The arbitration clause designating the lessee's Managing Director as sole arbitrator is upheld as valid under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, absent contravention of public policy.
1 Feb 2022The Supreme Court heard appeals by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment of the Bombay High Court. The dispute arose from a lease agreemen...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.
9 Jul 2012The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...
- 125
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
28 Nov 2025The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...
- 131
