Search Results for "Agricultural Lands Tribunal"

746 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 746 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Land Tribunal Case — Appellants Granted Opportunity to Prove Tenancy Rights. The Court set aside the Land Tribunal's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the Tribunal must consider all evidence and provide a reasoned order.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original tenant, filed a writ appeal against the order of the Single Judge in W.P.No.4974/2012 dated 06/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Taxation of Forest Tree Sale Proceeds. Proceeds from 'Clear Felling' of Spontaneous Growth Trees Leaving Stumps for Regeneration Held to be Revenue Receipt under the Income Tax Act, 1922.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the taxability of proceeds from the sale of forest trees under a 'clear felling' agreement. The assessee's father...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Filed by Legal Heirs of Defendant Against Decree in Partition Suit. Appeals Arise from Common Judgment Partly Decreeing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Ancestral Properties.

The appeals arose from a common judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2640/1988 and O.S.No.5075/2000 by the I Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal for Condonation of 837-Day Delay Due to Lack of Plausible Explanation — Administrative Apathy Not Sufficient Ground for Condonation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat and another (the applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 837 da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Over Succession and Conveyance Validity. Court holds that the trial court's order granting blanket injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie title was unsustainable under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The judgment arises from three appeals filed by defendants against an interim order passed by the 8th Civil Judge, S.D., Thane on 3rd January 2013 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Land.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession over agricultural land. The trial court dismissed the suit, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings of Fact in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Petitioner failed to establish tenancy rights as adopted son of deceased tenant due to lack of credible evidence and introduction of new pleas at belated stage.

The petitioner, Premanand Naik, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders of the Appellate Authority...