Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

596 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Loss Set-off Case. Loss from derivatives trading on recognized stock exchange held not speculative under Section 43(5)(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961, and can be set off against other business income under Section 70.

The appellant, Souvenir Developers (I) Pvt. Ltd., is a domestic company deriving income from toll collection business and also trading in shares and d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Plaintiff in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Partnership Firm's Claim for Fabric Supplies Fails as Plaintiff Could Not Prove Exact Amount Due.

Textile Connection, a partnership firm, filed C.S.No.29 of 2000 seeking a decree for Rs.39,67,144 with interest at 24% per annum from the defendants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...