Search Results for "Writ Petition Criminal"

6227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Violation of Orders in Teacher Recruitment Case — No Willful Disobedience Found. State of Uttar Pradesh's Compliance with Interim Orders for Appointment of Assistant Teachers Under RTE Act, 2009 Upheld.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by Sanjai Kumar and others against Dr. Prabhat Kumar and other respondents/contemnors,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Specific Averments. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 Requires Specific Allegations of Role in Conduct of Business.

The petitioners, comprising a company and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assault on Advocate at Police Station Amounts to Criminal Contempt. Bar Council's Contempt Petition Alleges Interference with Administration of Justice Under Section 2(c)(iii) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

This contempt petition was filed by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, a statutory body under the Advocates Act, 1961, alleging criminal contempt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment for Temple Construction — No Public Interest Violation Found. Court held that allotment of land for a temple under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code does not require public auction and is permissible for religious purposes.

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Bapu Shankar Dighe and Dadasaheb Kusabapu Pawar, challenging the...