Search Results for "Strike without notice"

1189 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1189 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition and Striking Out of Defence Under Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC. Non-Compliance with Access Orders Disputed; Video Evidence and Counsellor Report Considered.

The appellant wife filed Family Court Appeal No.20 of 2013 challenging the order dated 8th November 2012 passed by the Family Court at Mumbai. By that...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Order Striking Off Defence in Easement Suit — Inquiry Required Before Penalty Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC. The court held that striking off defence is a harsh order and can only be passed after an inquiry establishing wilful disobedience of an injunction order.

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for easementary rights, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Quepem dated 16.9.2020,...