Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Conversion of Open Space to Commercial Plot by MIDC — Violation of Public Trust and Statutory Procedure. Allotment of Reserved Open Space Without Following Section 14 of MIDC Act and Without Public Auction is Illegal.

5 Jul 2022

The petitioners, residents of Waluj Industrial Area, Aurangabad, and one of them being an industrial unit holder, challenged the action of the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.

5 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Order for Demolition of Toilet Constructed on Common Well. Construction of Toilet and Septic Tank on a Common Well Without Permission Violates Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Public Health Norms.

18 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Milagrina D'Mello, and the first respondent, John Gonsalves, are neighbours sharing a common well on the boundary of their properties....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Revalidate NOC for Construction Near Air Force Station. Refusal based on non-existent policy and without hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 14.

23 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati, sole proprietor of Nyati Housing, challenged letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021 issued by Resp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BBMP Endorsement and Defence Ministry Letter Restricting Construction Near Defence Establishment — Executive Guidelines Cannot Override Statutory Rights Under Article 300A and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court held that the Works of Defence Act, 1903 occupies the field and any restrictions must be imposed under its provisions, not through executive guidelines.

29 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd. and Merushikhar Infra LLP, owned property in Bangalore. They sought to construct a building and obtained a l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Landlord Not Necessary Party in Tenant's Suit Against Corporation for Demolition. The test for necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC is whether the suit outcome affects the legal interest of the landlord, which is not satisfied when the tenant seeks to restrain demolition of the tenanted premises.

14 Dec 2021

The judgment involves four writ petitions where the common question is whether the owner/landlord of the suit premises is a necessary or proper party ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years. The court held that the reservation on the petitioners' lands for 'Housing for Dishoused and E.W.S. Housing' lapsed as the planning authority did not acquire the lands within the statutory period under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

30 Jun 2010

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Revisional Survey Nos. 909/2/3, 909/2/9, 909/2/6, 909/2/1, and 909/2/11 at Miraj, Sangli, filed a writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition in Part and Directs Landlord to Provide Permanent Alternate Accommodation Despite Completion of Construction. Non-compliance with IOD Condition No.10 and Court Order Renders Commencement Certificate Irregular, Entitling Tenant to Specific Performance of Obligation.

15 Nov 2019

The petitioner, a tenant of a room in Gayatri Bhuvan building at Malad, Mumbai, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 alleging collusive ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Acquisition or Restoration of Land in Land Acquisition Act Case — Possession Already Taken Under Award. Writ of Mandamus Cannot Compel Acquisition When Land Vests in State Under Section 16 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

23 Oct 2015

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to acquire t...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)