Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years. The court held that the reservation on the petitioners' lands for 'Housing for Dishoused and E.W.S. Housing' lapsed as the planning authority did not acquire the lands within the statutory period under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, owners of lands bearing Revisional Survey Nos. 909/2/3, 909/2/9, 909/2/6, 909/2/1, and 909/2/11 at Miraj, Sangli, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that the reservation on their lands as Reservation Site No. 65 for 'Housing for Dishoused and E.W.S. Housing' in the sanctioned development plan of Miraj City had lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act). The development plan came into force on 30/6/1979. The planning authority, initially the Miraj Municipal Council and later the Sangli, Miraj & Kupwad Municipal Corporation, did not take any steps to acquire the lands or develop them for the designated purpose for over ten years. The petitioners issued a purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, but the respondents failed to acquire the lands within the statutory period. The court, relying on the provisions of Section 127, held that since the acquisition was not completed within ten years from the date of the reservation, the reservation lapsed, and the lands stood released from reservation. The court allowed the petition, declaring the reservation lapsed and directing the respondents to release the lands from reservation, making them available to the petitioners for development as per the development plan.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Reservation Lapse - Section 127 MRTP Act - Failure to Acquire - The petitioners' lands were reserved for 'Housing for Dishoused and E.W.S. Housing' in the development plan sanctioned on 30/6/1979. The planning authority did not acquire the lands within ten years. The court held that the reservation lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, and the lands stand released from reservation, becoming available to the owners for development. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the petitioners' lands under the sanctioned development plan has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966, due to non-acquisition within the prescribed period.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, declaring that the reservation on the petitioners' lands has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, and the lands stand released from reservation, becoming available to the petitioners for development as per the development plan.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapses if acquisition not completed within ten years from date of reservation
  • Section 127 MRTP Act
  • 1966
  • landowner entitled to develop land after lapse
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (06) 109

WRIT PETITION NO. 3171 OF 2009

2010-06-30

P B MAJMUDAR, R M SAVANT

Mr. T S Ingale for the Petitioners, Mr. U R Mankapure for the Respondent No.1, Mr. A B Vagyani, AGP for the Respondents/State

Shri Pramod Moreshwar Patwardhan, Shri Pradeep Moreshwar Patwardhan, Smt.Sadhana Govind Joshi, Sou.Aruna Vinayak Dandekar, Sou Anjali Ajit Damle

Sangli, Miraj & Kupwad Municipal Corporation, The Asstt. Director, Town Planning Department, Sangli, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking declaration that reservation on petitioners' lands has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the reservation on the petitioners' lands has lapsed and the lands stand released from reservation, becoming available for development.

Filing Reason

The planning authority failed to acquire the petitioners' lands within ten years from the date of reservation in the sanctioned development plan.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the petitioners' lands under the sanctioned development plan has lapsed under Section 127 of the MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within ten years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the lands were reserved since 30/6/1979 and no acquisition steps were taken within ten years, hence the reservation lapsed under Section 127. Respondents did not contest the lapse; the court noted that the acquisition was not completed within the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved for a public purpose is not acquired within ten years from the date of the reservation, the reservation lapses, and the land becomes available to the owner for development.

Judgment Excerpts

By the above Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners seek a declaration that the reservation in respect of the Petitioners lands ... has lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Since the said lands were neither acquired nor developed for the purpose they were so designated in the sanctioned development plan for considerable period of time, the reservation has lapsed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 3171 of 2009 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 127
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years. The court held that the reservation on the petitioners' lands for 'Housing for Dishoused and E.W.S. Housin...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the ...