Search Results for "regulatory jurisdiction"

1178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Inapplicability of S. Nithya Judgments to Cricket Associations in Membership and Election Dispute. Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association Appeals Against Madras High Court's Application of Athletics Governance Reforms to Cricket Association

The Supreme Court heard appeals from the Appellant against the Madras High Court's judgment that applied directions from S. Nithya cases to the cricke...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Electricity Distribution Company Against Ombudsman Orders in Seasonal Consumer Billing Dispute. Demand Charges Must Be Based on Actual Utilisation, Not Contract Demand, Under Clause 14.11 of Tariff and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission Regulations, 2005.

The petitioner, Executive Engineer (O&M) of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, a distribution licensee, filed a petition under Articles 226 and 227 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears section 34 petition challenging arbitral award; outcome not specified. The petition challenged an appellate arbitral award that had affirmed an earlier primary award, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Jagadeesa G. Chary, filed Arbitration Petition No. 410 of 2014 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010217682014_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...