High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears section 34 petition challenging arbitral award; outcome not specified. The petition challenged an appellate arbitral award that had affirmed an earlier primary award, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jagadeesa G. Chary, filed Arbitration Petition No. 410 of 2014 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the Appellate Arbitral Award dated October 15, 2013. The Appellate Award had affirmed the Primary Arbitral Award dated April 15, 2013. The respondent was Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd. Advocates for petitioner: Ms. Prachi Pandya, for respondent: Mr. Naushad Engineer, Senior Counsel. The Court reserved judgment on February 21, 2025 and pronounced it on June 9, 2025. The nature of the dispute, grounds for challenge, arguments, and the Court's decision are not detailed in the extracted text.

Issue of Consideration

Challenge to Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (06) 40

Arbitration Petition No. 410 of 2014

2025-06-09

Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.

Ms. Prachi Pandya, Mr. Naushad Engineer, Senior Counsel, Sharad Parbat

Jagadeesa G. Chary

Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral Award.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the Appellate Arbitral Award dated October 15, 2013.

Filing Reason

Challenge to the award affirming the Primary Award.

Previous Decisions

The Primary Arbitral Award dated April 15, 2013 was affirmed by the Appellate Arbitral Award dated October 15, 2013.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) impugning an Arbitral Award dated October 15, 2013 (“Appellate Award”), which in turn is an affirmation of another Arbitral Award dated April 15, 2013 (“Primary Award”)

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Arbitration Petition No. 410 of 2014 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the Appellate Arbitral Award dated October 15, 2013, which had affirmed the Primary Arbitral Award dated April 15, 2013. The High Court reserved judgment on February 21, 2025 and pronounced judgment on June 9, 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Under Section 271B for Delay in Filing Tax Audit Report — Holds That Prior to 1995 Amendment, Only Obtaining Audit Report by Specified Date Was Mandatory, Not Filing It. The court interpret...