KAHC010220972024_1
20 Jul 2026These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
Search Results for "maximum damages"
432 result(s) found
Found 432 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Orders in Section 9 Applications for Injunction in Water Supply Project Dispute. Court Examines Whether Injunction Preventing Contract Termination Amounts to Impermissible Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
24 Oct 2016The matter involved two arbitration appeals arising from interim applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispu...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.
4 Jun 2015The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Public Interest Litigations in Road Development Contract Dispute. Reiterates Stringent Locus Standi Requirements Under Article 226 to Prevent Abuse of Process by Meddlesome Bystanders.
14 Oct 2014The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of multiple public interest litigations and writ petitions concerning the Kolhapur Integrated Road ...
- 33
High Court
Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.
18 Jan 2014The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender Process; Holds Filing of False Documents Renders Bidder Ineligible. The Court Rules That Lowest Bidder Acquires No Vested Right Before Final Approval by Competent Authority, Upholding Rejection Under Clause Permitting Rejection of Any Tender.
18 Dec 2019The writ petition arose from a tender floated by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation for reconstruction of a bus stand at Beed. The petit...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.
13 Sep 2019The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Respondent in Indian Oil Corporation Tender Dispute; Tie-Breaker Clause Preferring Younger Candidate Found Not Discriminatory. Petitioner's Challenge to Clause 7.2.1(b) of Brochure Under Article 14 Rejected as Age is Not an Immutable Characteristic and Participation Waives Challenge.
2 Apr 2025Background: The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a policy of Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) governing tie-breaker...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Dismissal of LPA in Land Possession Suit Involving Co-operative Society Charge – Re-conveyance Dispute. Civil appeal arises from High Court's affirmation of Single Judge's setting aside of trial court's decree of possession based on interpretation of Sections 47 and 48 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and the effect of subsequent release of society's charge.
26 Jul 2026The dispute pertained to agricultural land in Maharashtra that was ancestral property of the original plaintiff. The plaintiff had obtained a loan fro...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.
14 Jun 2011The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...
- 10
