High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a member of the Indian National Congress Legislature Party) and others, challenging the induction of three individuals—Radhakrushna Vikhe Patil, Jaydatta Kshirsagar, and Avinash Mahatekar—as ministers in the Maharashtra State Cabinet. The petitioners contended that the inductees, having resigned from their original parties and the Legislative Assembly, were not members of either House of the State Legislature. With less than six months remaining in the term of the Legislative Assembly, there was no possibility of a bye-election being held to enable them to get elected, as required by Article 164(4) of the Constitution and barred by Section 151-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The petitioners argued that the induction was a colourable exercise of power to circumvent the anti-defection law and defeated the constitutional purpose of ensuring that non-legislator ministers face the electorate. The court heard extensive arguments from counsel for the petitioners and respondents, and after granting rule and taking the matter up for final disposal with consent, reserved judgment. The core legal question was whether the power under Article 164(4) is absolute or must be exercised only where there is a realistic possibility of the appointee getting elected within six months. The decision was reserved.

Issue of Consideration

Whether the induction of individuals as ministers in the Maharashtra State Cabinet who are not members of the State Legislature and cannot get elected within six months due to the remaining term of the Legislative Assembly being less than six months is violative of Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India read with Articles 173, 191 and the Tenth Schedule.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India requires a minister who is not a member of the legislature to be elected within six months
  • induction of a non-legislator when the remaining term of the House is less than six months may render compliance impossible
  • Section 151-A of the Representation of the People Act
  • 1951 bars bye-elections if the remainder of the term is less than one year
  • such induction may amount to a colourable exercise of power and violate the Tenth Schedule's anti-defection intent.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (09) 40

Writ Petition No. 6996 of 2019 and Writ Petition No. 6922 of 2019

2019-09-13

S.C. Dharmadhikari, G.S. Patel

SB Talekar, Madhavi Ayyappan, VA Thorat, PP Kakade, AA Purav, Vinayak D Hon, Prachi A Tatake, VR Kasle, BK Barve, Archana Lad

Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar; Surinder Mohan Arora, Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale, Sandeep Vijay Kulkarni

State of Maharashtra, The Chief Minister, Maharashtra, Governor of Maharashtra, Speaker, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, Radhakrushna Vikhe Patil, Jaydatta Kshirsagar, Avinash Mahatekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the induction of non-legislators as Cabinet Ministers and Minister of State in the Maharashtra State Cabinet.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that the induction is unconstitutional and a direction for time-bound disposal of disqualification petitions pending before the Speaker.

Filing Reason

The inductees, having resigned from their parties and the Legislative Assembly, could not comply with the requirement under Article 164(4) of the Constitution to become members of the legislature within six months, as the remaining term of the Assembly was less than six months.

Previous Decisions

Disqualification applications filed before the Speaker on 17th June 2019, pending decision.

Issues

Whether the induction of respondents 5, 6 and 7 as ministers, who are not members of the State Legislature and cannot get elected within six months because the remaining term of the Legislative Assembly is less than six months, violates Article 164(4) read with Articles 173, 191 and the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Mr Talekar for the petitioners argued that the power under Article 164(4) is not unfettered and must be exercised only when there is a realistic possibility of the appointee getting elected within six months; with less than six months left, no bye-election is possible under Section 151-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, rendering the induction a colourable exercise of power to circumvent the anti-defection provisions and the constitutional mandate; the induction makes a mockery of democratic principles and the rule of law.

Judgment Excerpts

Probity in public administration and ensuring purity in public afairs is the object behind the insertion of these Constitutional provisions. (Para 15) That Article itself should not be read in isolation but must be read along with Articles 173 and 191(2) and the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution. (Para 16) The power to induct a non-legislator into a ministerial berth is not an unfettered one. That power has to be exercised on an assurance and understanding that any such non-legislator will get himself or herself elected within six months;... (Para 18)

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the induction of non-legislators as ministers. The High Court issued Rule, and the respondents waived service. With consent of both sides, the petitions were taken up for final disposal. The matter was heard on 9th September 2019 and judgment was pronounced on 13th September 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 163, 164(1-B), 164(4), 173, 191, Tenth Schedule
  • Representation of Peoples Act, 1951: Section 151-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.
Related Judgement
High Court OSA. No. 16 of 2023