Search Results for "developer permission"

638 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 638 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Consider NA Permission Application Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Petitioner's Application Must Be Decided on Merits Without Being Influenced by Civil Court Orders Regarding Title Disputes.

The petitioner, M/s Annapurna Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Trust's Application for Alienation of Immovable Property Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as No Error of Law or Jurisdiction Found.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Megh Realty and Developers Private Limited against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Forest Conservation Case Against Railway Land Development. NGT's Finding That Land Is Not Forest Land Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Upheld, as Appellants Failed to Prove Land Met Statutory Definition and Provided Unauthorized Evidence.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dismissing an original application challenging a Request for Proposal (RFP) issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Right Certificate Issued to Developer. Court holds that issuance of DRC under MRTP Act was valid and no loss to public exchequer was caused.

The petitioner, Mr. Manoj Jaswantlal Kapadia, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the issuance of a Developmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...