Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

520 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Prior Suit Filed in Wrong Court — Filing of Suit in Court Without Jurisdiction Does Not Bar Subsequent Arbitration Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Candid Drug Distributors, filed a suit in the competent court in Guwahati against the respondent, Wanbury Limited. The respondent chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commercial Supply Dispute — Upholds Award on Unpaid Invoices but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Arbitrator's findings on oral contracts and quantum of supplies upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The petitioner, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Co-defendant in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Deletion of Party Ordered Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Co-defendant Against Whom No Relief Claimed is Not a Necessary Party.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a suit filed by Vidharbha Enterprises (plaintiff) against the Union of India and BSNL (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Suit Regarding Applicability of 120-Day Timeline for Written Statement. The mandatory timeline under Order V Rule 1 CPC as amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply to suits filed before the Act's enactment and subsequently transferred under Section 15.

28 Jan 2021

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Developer Against Dissenting Society Members. The Court held that balance of convenience favored appointment of Receiver to preserve subject matter pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Shree Krishna Homes Pvt. Ltd., a developer, entered into a development agreement dated 14th December 2011 with respondent No.1, a coop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Transfer of Domestic Violence Proceedings to Family Court Under Section 24 CPC and Article 227. Family Court's Concurrent Jurisdiction Over DV Act Reliefs and Avoidance of Conflicting Decisions Were Central to the Court's Analysis.

8 Oct 2021

The applicant husband and respondent wife were married as per Hindu rites and customs on 08/10/2000. Their matrimonial relationship became strained, a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Relegating Plaintiff to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Non-Signatory to Arbitration Agreement Cannot Invoke Section 8 Against Willing Party. Amendment to Section 8 in 2016 is Procedural and Retrospective, But Does Not Confer Right on a Non-Party to Compel Arbitration.

17 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Smt. Sushma Swaraj, filed a suit for specific performance (O.S. No. 458/2014) against M/s Blue Valley Properties Pvt. Ltd. (1st defend...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

2 May 2012

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

3 Dec 2025

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

41 42 43 44 45

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)