Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

679 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 679 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1/- Set Aside. Court held that when market value is determined, compensation cannot be reduced to a nominal amount under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1 Set Aside. Market Value of Rs.6,417/sq.m. Awarded with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Gunthewari Regularization Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Under Section 18 of Maharashtra Gunthewari Development Act, 2001 for Challenging Regularization Order Under Section 3 of the Act.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.185 of 2015 challenging an order of regularization dated 12.12.2006 passed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures in Mohili Village. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to occupy public land and structures were found to be illegal encroachments under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, 14 individuals occupying shops and structures in Mohili Village, Sakinaka, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the proposed dem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Construction of Transit Camps on Reserved Land in Violation of MRTP Act. Construction on Land Reserved for Playground and Primary School Under Development Plan Held Illegal Despite Being Part of JNNURM Project.

The petitioners, residents of Ulhasnagar, challenged resolutions of the Standing Committee and General Body of the Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corporation (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for cooperative society extension deemed lapsed under Sections 126 and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Balwant Talange and others, owned survey no. 907 in Miraj city. On 26-04-1979, the Town Planning Authority reserved this la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1915 OF 2010

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation for Directions to Provide Hygienic Public Toilets to Women Walking on Streets. Obligatory Duty of Municipal Corporations to Construct and Maintain Latrines Under Section 63 and 61 of Respective Acts Held Inseparable from Right to Life with Dignity.

A public interest litigation was filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, raising critical issu...