Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for cooperative society extension deemed lapsed under Sections 126 and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ramchandra Balwant Talange and others, owned survey no. 907 in Miraj city. On 26-04-1979, the Town Planning Authority reserved this land in the development plan for extension of a cooperative society. The plan was sanctioned and came into force in June 1979. No acquisition action was taken by the respondents for over ten years. On 12-06-1995, the petitioner issued a notice under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) to the Miraj Municipal Council, requiring them to acquire the land for the reservation purpose within the stipulated time. Despite this notice, no acquisition was made. The petitioner then filed a writ petition challenging the reservation on the ground that it violated Sections 126 and 127 of the MRTP Act. The court considered the provisions of Sections 126 and 127, which provide that if land reserved in a development plan is not acquired within ten years from the date of notice under Section 126, the reservation lapses and the land reverts to the owner free from reservation. The court found that the petitioner had issued the notice under Section 126 on 12-06-1995, and more than ten years had elapsed without any acquisition. Therefore, the reservation had lapsed. The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation of the petitioner's land had lapsed and the land was free from reservation.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Reservation Lapse - Sections 126 and 127 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Land reserved for extension of cooperative society - Petitioner issued notice under Section 126 on 12-06-1995 requiring acquisition within stipulated time - No acquisition made within ten years - Held that reservation lapses and land reverts to petitioner free from reservation (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation of the petitioner's land under the development plan lapses due to non-acquisition within the statutory period under Sections 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, declaring that the reservation of the petitioner's land had lapsed and the land was free from reservation.

Law Points

  • Reservation lapses if acquisition not completed within ten years from date of notice under Section 126
  • Section 127 MRTP Act
  • 1966
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (01) 130

Writ Petition No. 1325 of 2002

2005-01-13

V.G. Palshikar, Smt. Nishita Mhatre

Shri R.G. Ketkar with V.M. Mali for the petitioner; Shri T.S. Ingale for Respondent no.1; Shri S.R. Page for Respondent no.2

Ramchandra Balwant Talange and others

Sangli Miraj and Kupwad Municipal Corporation, Sangli; Govindraoji Marathe Industrial Estate Co-op. Sty. Ltd., Miraj; State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging reservation of land under development plan.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought declaration that reservation of his land had lapsed due to non-acquisition within statutory period.

Filing Reason

Reservation of petitioner's land for extension of cooperative society was not acted upon by acquisition within ten years of notice under Section 126.

Issues

Whether reservation of land lapses under Sections 126 and 127 of MRTP Act due to non-acquisition within ten years of notice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that despite notice under Section 126, no acquisition was made within ten years, hence reservation lapsed.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Sections 126 and 127 of the MRTP Act, if land reserved in a development plan is not acquired within ten years from the date of notice under Section 126, the reservation lapses and the land reverts to the owner free from reservation.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the reservation made by the respondent, Town Planning Authority, in relation to land belonging to the petitioner on the ground that it violates the provisions of sections 126 and 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act 1966. No action whatever was taken by the respondents and ultimately on 12th June 1995 after lapse of more than ten years, the petitioner issued notice to Miraj Municipal Council as contemplated by section 126 of the M.R.T.P. Act requiring them to acquire the same land for the purpose of reservation within the stipulated time. Inspite of this notice, no acquisition was made.

Procedural History

Reservation made on 26-04-1979; plan sanctioned June 1979; petitioner issued notice under Section 126 on 12-06-1995; no acquisition; writ petition filed in 2002.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 126, 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for cooperative society extension deemed lapsed under Sections 126 and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Plan...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Negligence Apportionment and Income Assessment. The Court Enhanced Compensation from Rs.1,45,840 to Rs.3,22,840 under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, holding that the ...