Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Construction of Transit Camps on Reserved Land in Violation of MRTP Act. Construction on Land Reserved for Playground and Primary School Under Development Plan Held Illegal Despite Being Part of JNNURM Project.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 139
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents of Ulhasnagar, challenged resolutions of the Standing Committee and General Body of the Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corporation (First Respondent) dated 25 August 2009 and 13 November 2009 respectively, which approved the construction of transit camps on two plots of land: Plot 705 (Sheet No. 60/61, Camp No.2 Sector No.3) admeasuring 19540 square yards reserved for a playground, and Plot 103 (Sheet No. 54, Camp No.5, Sector 8) admeasuring 7366 square yards reserved for a primary school and playground under the sanctioned Development Plan of 1974. The Municipal Corporation decided to construct tenements for slum residents of Rahul Nagar and Valmiki Nagar under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), a project approved by the State Government in 2008 and the Union Government on 3 February 2009 at a cost of Rs.35.38 crores. The petitioners contended that the construction violated Section 37A of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), which only permits temporary use of reserved playground land for functions and events not exceeding 12 days at a time and 30 days in a calendar year. The Municipal Corporation argued that under Section 37(1AA) of the MRTP Act, the State Government could modify the Development Plan on an urgent basis, but admitted that no such modification was sought. The court held that any development must be consistent with the sanctioned Development Plan, and the ends cannot justify the means. The Municipal Corporation's action was a brazen act of illegality. However, considering the Municipal Corporation's affidavit dated 10 May 2013 stating that the transit camps would be demolished and removed by the end of March 2014, and that permanent accommodation was being constructed at an alternate location, the court directed the Municipal Corporation to demolish and remove the transit camps by 31 March 2014 and to file a compliance affidavit by 15 April 2014. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Development Plan - Reservation - Section 37A Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Construction of transit camps on land reserved for playground and primary school - Held that such construction is in violation of Section 37A which only permits temporary use for functions and events not exceeding 12 days at a time and 30 days in a calendar year - The Municipal Corporation as Planning Authority is duty bound to enforce the Act and cannot breach it even for a laudable project (Paras 2-3).

B) Town Planning - Modification of Development Plan - Section 37(1AA) Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Urgent modification - Held that no recourse was taken to this power by the State Government, and the construction remains illegal (Para 2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether construction of transit camps on land reserved for playground and primary school under the Development Plan is permissible under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corporation to demolish and remove the transit camps by 31 March 2014 and file a compliance affidavit by 15 April 2014. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Development must be consistent with sanctioned Development Plan
  • Section 37A MRTP Act prohibits use of reserved playground land except for limited temporary purposes
  • Planning Authority cannot breach MRTP Act even for laudable projects
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (06) 83

Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2010

2013-06-28

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, S.C. Gupte

Mr. S.M. Gorwadkar for the Petitioners, Mr. S.M. Kamble for Respondent No.1, Mr. Samir Patil for Respondent No.3

Aziz Amir Shaikh & Anr.

Ulhas Nagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging construction of transit camps on land reserved for playground and primary school under the Development Plan.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of resolutions and removal of transit camps.

Filing Reason

Construction of transit camps on land reserved for playground and primary school in breach of the sanctioned Development Plan and Section 37A of the MRTP Act.

Previous Decisions

Standing Committee resolution dated 25 August 2009 and General Body resolution dated 13 November 2009 approved the construction; work order issued on 25 August 2009.

Issues

Whether construction of transit camps on land reserved for playground and primary school under the Development Plan violates Section 37A of the MRTP Act. Whether the Municipal Corporation can justify the construction under Section 37(1AA) without recourse to modification of the Development Plan.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: Construction violates Section 37A which only permits temporary use of reserved playground land for limited purposes. Respondent No.1: Project is under JNNURM for slum rehabilitation; Section 37(1AA) allows urgent modification of Development Plan, though no such modification was sought.

Ratio Decidendi

Any development or use of land must be consistent with the sanctioned Development Plan. The provisions of the MRTP Act cannot be breached even for a laudable public project. The Planning Authority is duty bound to enforce its obligations under the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

There is no doubt about the legal position that the construction of a transit camp on land which is reserved for the public purposes of a playground is in violation of Section 37A. What has been done by the First Respondent is a brazen act of illegality which must be deprecated in the strongest possible terms by directing the removal of the transit camps forthwith.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2010 challenging resolutions of August and November 2009. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 28 June 2013, noting an affidavit of 10 May 2013 undertaking demolition by March 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 37A, Section 37(1AA)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Search Conducted Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive ...