KAHC010137632012_1
23 Feb 2023...
Search Results for "Electricity Supply"
1280 result(s) found
Found 1280 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Death of Agricultural Labourer Due to Electrocution as Incident Did Not Arise Out of and in the Course of Employment. The court held that the death of a 'Salgadi' (yearly labourer) due to electrocution while cutting grass for personal use, not for the employer's work, does not fall within the purview of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
13 Oct 2017The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by Chandrakant Toshniwal, the owner of agricultural land, ...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Crop Pattern Changes in Gunjawani Irrigation Project — No Scientific Basis Found for Challenge. Court held that changes in crop pattern approved by State Level Technical Assessment Committee (SLTAC-II) were based on proper data and analysis, and petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness.
1 Oct 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by agriculturists from Bhor and Velha Talukas in Pune district, challenging changes in the crop pattern...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MSETCL — Holds Termination Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Contractual Stipulations. The court set aside the termination order and directed restoration of status quo ante, emphasizing that contractual clauses requiring show cause notice must be adhered to.
10 Jan 2022The petitioner, Maha Active Engineers India Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondents, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. ...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tata Power to Implement 220 KV Transmission Line Project Subject to Compliance with Environmental and Forest Laws. The court directed the respondents to allow implementation of the project in public interest, subject to conditions including compensatory afforestation and mangrove protection.
2 Mar 2022The petitioners, The Tata Power Company Limited and a shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direct...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.
1 Mar 2013The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
4 Oct 2013The appellant, Eknath s/o Laxman Gaikwad, was a Lineman (Assistant Lineman) employed at the Fuse Call Centre of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M...
- 120
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes NCLT Order Directing State to Permit Windmill Operations in Insolvency Case. NCLT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Exercising Judicial Review Over Administrative Decision, Following Supreme Court Decision in Embassy Property Developments v. State of Karnataka.
13 Apr 2023The dispute arose out of insolvency proceedings against M/s Wind World (India) Limited, which held a lease over forest land for operating windmills. T...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.
6 Nov 2006The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...
- 125
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in MSMED Act Arbitration Cases on Limitation and Counterclaim Issues. The Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to arbitration proceedings under Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, and counterclaims are maintainable under Section 23(2A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, affirming the High Court's remand and arbitrator appointment orders.
29 Jun 2021The Supreme Court of India addressed two consolidated civil appeals involving arbitration proceedings under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises De...
- 246
