Search Results for "ownership period"

3110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Claim for Possession in Property Dispute Based on Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Defense. Licensee's Possession Cannot Be Converted into Adverse Possession Without Clear Evidence of Ouster.

The dispute pertained to a suit property in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, claimed ownership of the property as joint family proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Suit Against Bank for Demurrage Charges — Bank Not Owner Under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Suit Against Bank Barred by Limitation as Goods Sold in 1979 and Suit Filed in 1982.

The plaintiff, Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay (BPT), filed a suit against defendant No.1 (M/s. South Iron & Steel Co.) and defendant No.2 (Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Gum by Forest Officials — Transit Passes Valid and Seizure Without Authority Under Forest Act. Petitioner had valid contract and transit passes for gum collection; seizure at destination without proper authority held illegal.

The petitioner, Arjun Ratansing Jadhav, was the highest bidder in an auction for collection of gum from Chalisgaon forest area for the period 26.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Property Dispute Over Development Rights — Agreement for Sale Not Enforceable Without Registered Conveyance Deed.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the original plaintiff, Smt. Nirmala Dhandukhlal Thakkar, seeking a permanent injunction restraining the appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance of Land Acquisition Order. Conditional Order Does Not Amount to Willful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Chinchwad Devasthan Trust, a public religious trust, owned land admeasuring about 1,05,400 sq.m at Bhosari within the jurisdictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...