Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTP Act 1966"

561 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 561 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.

5 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Thane Municipal Corporation's Abeyance of Buy-Back Policy - Promissory Estoppel Applied. The court held that the Corporation could not resile from its policy after the petitioners acted on it to their detriment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

1 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Sheth Developers Pvt Ltd and Ashwin Natwarlal Sheth, acquired development rights over land from Voltas Ltd in 2003. In 2016, the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Additional DRCs in Road Construction Case — Mandamus Issued to MCGM to Issue DRCs for Balance 75% Area of Amenity Road Constructed and Taken Over. Petitioners entitled to DRCs for entire area under Development Control Regulations Appendix VII(6) based on Supreme Court precedent.

10 Jul 2014

The petitioners, Novartis India Limited, Oberoi Realty Limited, and Shri Vikas Oberoi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act — Purchase Notice Served After 18 Years, No Acquisition Within 24 Months, Reservation Deemed Lapsed. The court held that the Director of Town Planning correctly declared the reservation lapsed as the statutory conditions under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 were met.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Subhashchandra Hukumchand Khurana, owned agricultural land in Mouza Warud, District Amravati, within the limits of Municipal Council, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Builders' Challenge to NMC's Refusal to Sanction Building Plans Based on Deemed Sanction Under Section 45(4) of MRTP Act. Court holds that failure to communicate objections within prescribed period results in deemed sanction, and subsequent refusal is invalid.

21 Apr 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Gowardhan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Vedbhoomi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Land Development Dispute — Trial Court's Order Restraining Obstruction to Possession Upheld. The court held that the trial court's order under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC was based on prima facie findings of possession and balance of convenience, and no interference was warranted under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC.

15 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from an interim injunction order dated 17th June, 2019 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 353/2019. The respondent-p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

21 Nov 2015

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)