Search Results for "Tribunal error"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Tribunal error"

4669 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4669 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief for Possession of Flats. Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion in Denying Interim Measures Under Section 17 Upheld, as No Patent Illegality or Perversity Demonstrated in Orders Dated February 14, 2019 and December 15, 2022.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Joint Development Agreement dated August 20, 2009, between the Owner (late Petitioners, represented by legal heirs) and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Negligent Truck Driver. Court Sets Aside Finding of Contributory Negligence and Applies Correct Multiplier and Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

31 Oct 2018

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the wife and minor children of Kishor Pawar, who died in a vehicular accident on 12 Marc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Two Vehicles Determined. The court held that the accident was caused solely by the rash and negligent driving of the KSRTC bus driver, and the compensation was enhanced to Rs. 8,50,000/- with interest at 6% per annum.

8 Jun 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimants, Lalitha and her minor daughter Nikila, filed a claim petition under ...

High Court

KAHC010028642011_1

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Order of Senior Citizens Tribunal Involving Right to Residence and Eviction. Court Reserves Judgment on Petitions Filed by Senior Citizen Mother and Son/Daughter-in-law Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

27 May 2025

The judgment involves two clubbed writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 29.01.2020 p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Contributory Negligence from 60% to 50%. The Court held that both drivers contributed equally to the accident and awarded enhanced compensation of ` 19,63,000 with interest.

4 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife and minor daughters of the deceased B. Umapathi, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 11-09-2010. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter’s Second Appeals in RERA Dispute as No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Interest Liability from 1.1.2017 Upheld as Factual Finding under Section 18 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Not Open to Reappreciation in Second Appeal under Section 58 Read with Section 100 CPC.

7 Jun 2018

The dispute arose from complaints filed by allottees under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 before the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

2 Jul 2026

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.

8 Dec 2010

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition, Setting Aside Industrial Tribunal's Finding that Enquiry was Vitiated Due to Unsigned Chargesheet. Court Rules that Non-Signing of Chargesheet is a Procedural Defect and Enquiry is Not Vitiated if Workman Understands Charges and No Prejudice is Established, Applying Test of Prejudice Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

23 Aug 2005

The dispute arose from the dismissal of the respondent workman, Prakash R. Parab, by his employer, Indian Airlines Ltd., on charges of theft. The work...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)