Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010028642011_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-01 08:13:41
  • 119
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010028642011_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (09) 27

WRIT PETITION Nos.6842-6880/2010 (S-KAT) C/W WRIT PETITION Nos.15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011,16948-16995/2010, 8215/2010, 8715/2010 & 8906/2010, 10106/2010 & 12726-12763/2010, 17294-17327/2010, 17481/2010 & 17485-17490/2010 & 17723-17727/2010, 19401/2011 & 21520-21530/2011, 24525/2010, 41905-41908/2010 & 6747-6758/2011, 908-911/2011, 103593/2014 & 103620-103657/2014 (S-KAT)

2014-09-23

D.H. Waghela, Chief Justice, H.G. Ramesh, Justice

H. Subramanya Jois, Sr. Counsel for K.C. Shanthakumar; Madhusudan R Naik, Sr. Advocate as Spl. Counsel along with Ravindra D.K., Advocate for R1 & R2; J Prashanth for M/s Ravivarma Kumar Associates, Advocates for R3, R8-R10, R13, R15, R18, R20, R21, R23, R24, R25 & R27-R31, 33-41; S M Babu, Advocate for R4, R5, R14, R16, R17,R19 & R22; C.M.Nagabhushan & P.V.Chandrashekar, Advocates for R6, R7 & R26; H Kantharaj, Advocate for C/R12; V Lakshminarayan, Sr. Counsel for L. Vijayakumar, Advocate for R42; D N Nanjundareddy, Sr. Counsel for Nityanand, Advocates for R11 & R32; Shridhar Prabhu, Advocate for petitioner in WP 15002/2011 & 21131-21146/2011

Mahesh A C & Ors.

State of Karnataka & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Refers Matter to Larger Bench on Retrospective Seniority in State Forest Service. The court identified conflicting judicial opinions on the legality of granting retrospective seniority to promotees over direct recruits. 2026-11-01 12:10:31
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Reserves Verdict on Stay of Film ‘Black Friday’ Amid Pending Trial in 1993 Blasts Case. Accused Argues Docudrama Constitutes Contempt and Defamation, Violates Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21. 2026-11-01 12:10:20
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?