Search Results for "Export contract"

537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Return of Plaint in Summary Suit, Holds Dispute Not Commercial Under Commercial Courts Act. Assignment of Debt by Leasing Company Not an Ordinary Transaction of Financier or Trader Under Section 2(1)(c)(i) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The case involves an Interim Application filed by Defendant No. 1 (Varanium Cloud Limited) seeking return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enforcement of Customs Facility Notice Against Shipping Lines. No Statutory Duty Imposed on Customs to Prosecute Shipping Lines for Non-Compliance with Facility Notice No.69 of 2011.

The petitioners, J.J. Polyplast Private Ltd, Aishwarya Plast Exports Private Ltd, and Mr. Sanjesh Jain, are importers dealing in plastic raw materials...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down BCCL's Tender Decision for Arbitrariness and Discrimination. The Supreme Court upholds fairness and transparency in government contracts, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.

The court held that government authorities, while exercising discretion in contractual matters, must ensure fairness, transparency, and equality. The ...