Search Results for "government land encroachment"

707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Trustees’ Authority in Managing Encroached Land for Slum Rehabilitation: Bombay High Court Clarifies. Bombay High Court allows PLAINTIFFS to collaborate with developers to undertake slum rehabilitation on its encroached lands, empowering trustees under the Public Trust Act.

1. Introduction:The plaintiffs, A. H. Wadia Trust, a public charitable trust, along with its trustees (Plaintiffs No. 2 to 5), approached the court vi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title over suit property.

The appellants, defendants in the original suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the...