Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Eviction from Government Grazing Land — Upholds Government Order Rejecting Revision Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Encroachers on Meikal Pomboke Land Failed to Establish Title; Government's Order Based on Proper Application of Mind and Earlier Division Bench Decision Upheld.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 148
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by individuals who were encroachers on government land classified as Meikal promboke (grazing land) in Survey No.78/1, Vengaivasal Village, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District. The Revenue Authorities initiated eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. A notice under Section 7 was issued, followed by a final notice under Section 6 after affording an opportunity of hearing. The encroachers appealed to the District Collector under Section 10 of the Act, but the appeal was rejected. Subsequently, they filed a revision before the Government, which was also rejected through the impugned Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021. The petitioners then approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking to quash the Government Order and for a direction to issue patta in their favor. The Court noted that the Government had elaborately considered the issue, including an earlier Division Bench order dated 10.10.2017 in W.P.Nos.26364 to 26376 of 2017 concerning other encroachers in the same survey number. The Court found that the petitioners had exhausted all statutory remedies and that the Government's order was based on proper application of mind. The Court held that no interference was warranted under Article 226 with the concurrent findings of fact, and dismissed all the writ petitions. The Court also observed that the government lands are valuable and cannot be allowed to be encroached upon.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Eviction of Encroachers - Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Sections 6, 7, 10 - Revision - The petitioners, who were encroachers on government Meikal promboke (grazing) land, challenged the Government Order rejecting their revision after eviction proceedings under the Act. The Court held that the petitioners had exhausted all statutory remedies and the Government had considered the matter elaborately, including an earlier Division Bench order. The writ petitions were dismissed as no interference was warranted with the concurrent findings of fact. (Paras 1-4)

B) Land Law - Government Grazing Land - Meikal Pomboke - Eviction - The Revenue Authorities identified encroachments in S.No.78/1 Vengaivasal Village, Tambaram, Chenglepet District. After issuing Section 7 notice and final notice under Section 6, the District Collector rejected the appeal under Section 10. The Government rejected the revision through G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021. The Court upheld the eviction, noting that the lands are valuable government property. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021 rejecting the revision of the petitioners under Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 is liable to be quashed in writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

All the writ petitions were dismissed. The Court upheld the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021 and the eviction of the petitioners from the government grazing land.

Law Points

  • Eviction of encroachers from government grazing land
  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act
  • 1905
  • Sections 6
  • 7
  • 10
  • Revision before Government
  • Exhaustion of statutory remedies
  • Writ jurisdiction under Article 226
  • No interference with concurrent findings of fact
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 273

W.P.Nos.18079, 18011, 18086, 18119, 18733, 19273, 20084, 20091, 20353 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.19310, 19312, 19313, 19248, 19317, 19318, 19319, 19321, 19331, 19347, 19348, 19999, 20580, 20583, 21347, 21348, 21351, 21362, 21364, 21365, 21597, 21607, 21608 of 2021

2026-02-16

S.M.Subramaniam, C.Kumarappan

2026:MHC:688

Ms.R.Nandhini (for petitioners), Mr.T.Arun Kumar (Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5), Mr.M.Elumalai (for R6)

Navamani and others

The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Government of Tamil Nadu and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Order rejecting revision against eviction from government grazing land.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to quash G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021 and to direct the respondents to issue patta in their favor for the property in Survey No.78/1A, New Survey No.78/19B, Vengaivasal Village.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were encroachers on government Meikal promboke (grazing) land and faced eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Their appeal and revision were rejected, leading to the filing of the writ petitions.

Previous Decisions

The District Collector rejected the appeal under Section 10 of the Act. The Government rejected the revision through G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021. An earlier Division Bench order dated 10.10.2017 in W.P.Nos.26364 to 26376 of 2017 concerning other encroachers in the same survey number was considered by the Government.

Issues

Whether the impugned Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021 is liable to be quashed in writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Government Order was arbitrary and that they were entitled to patta. The respondents (State) supported the eviction, stating that the lands are valuable government property and the encroachers had no title.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioners had exhausted all statutory remedies under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The Government had elaborately considered the issue, including an earlier Division Bench order, and found that the lands are valuable government property. No interference under Article 226 is warranted with concurrent findings of fact.

Judgment Excerpts

The present writ petitions have been instituted to assail the Government Order issued in G.O.Ms.No.500 Revenue and Disaster Management Land Disposal Department dated 04.08.2021. The Revenue Authorities identified encroachments in respect of Government Meikal promboke lands (grazing land) in S.No.78/1 Vengaivasal Village, Tambaram, Chenglepet District. Pertinently, in respect of the other encroachers, in the same survey number, the Division Bench of this Court considered and passed an order on 10.10.2017 in W.P.Nos.26364 to 26376 of 2017. Therefore, the petitioners have exhausted all the remedies contemplated under the Statute and the Government repeatedly considered the issue and found that the Government lands are valuable and cannot be allowed to be encroached upon.

Procedural History

The Revenue Authorities initiated eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. Section 7 notice was issued, followed by Section 6 final notice. The encroachers appealed to the District Collector under Section 10, which was rejected. They then filed a revision before the Government, which was rejected through G.O.Ms.No.500 dated 04.08.2021. The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905: 6, 7, 10
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Liberty to Approach Civil Court Already Implied, No Need for Express Grant.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Surplus Teacher Declaration Due to Violation of Seniority Rules Under MEPS Act, 1977. Petitioner's Appointment Approved and Seniority Ignored by Education Officer.