Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, twelve individuals claiming to be forest dwellers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra to decide their representations and to take a policy decision for relaxation of conditions that impede the grant of rights over forest lands occupied by them. They also sought a direction to grant them pattas (title deeds) similar to those granted in adjacent districts under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. The court, after hearing the counsel for both sides, disposed of the petition by directing the State to decide the petitioners' representations within a period of four months from the date of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and that the State should consider the representations in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Forest Rights - Recognition of Forest Rights - Direction to Decide Representations - Petitioners, claiming to be forest dwellers, sought direction to State to decide their representations for grant of rights under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 - Court directed the State to decide the representations within a stipulated period, without expressing any opinion on merits - Held that the State must consider the representations in accordance with law (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a direction to the State to decide their representations and grant them rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to decide the representations of the petitioners within a period of four months from the date of the order, in accordance with law. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Direction to decide representations
  • Relaxation of conditions for forest rights
  • Recognition of forest rights under Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act
  • 2006
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (02) 120

Writ Petition No.738 of 2016

2016-02-08

B. R. Gavai, P. N. Deshmukh

Mr. S.S.Dhengale for petitioners, Mrs.Bharti Dangre for respondents

Kashinath s/o. Haridas Shamkule and others

State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to decide representations and grant forest rights.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to decide representations and grant patta under the Forest Rights Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were forest dwellers and sought recognition of their rights over forest lands.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a direction to the State to decide their representations and grant them rights under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they are entitled to forest rights under the Act and that the State should decide their representations. Respondents did not oppose the direction to decide representations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court directed the State to decide the representations of the petitioners within a stipulated period, without expressing any opinion on the merits, as the State is obligated to consider such representations in accordance with law.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to decide their representations and to take a policy decision of relaxation of any of the conditions which would come in the way of granting any right, title or interest in respect of forest lands occupied by them. In the result, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent nos. 1 and 2 to decide the representations of the petitioners within a period of four months from today, in accordance with law.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.738 of 2016 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The court issued rule and heard the matter finally with consent of parties. The petition was disposed of on 8 February 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006: 4(3), 4(5), 4(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Decide Representations of Forest Dwellers Under Forest Rights Act. Petitioners Sought Recognition of Forest Rights and Patta Under Sections 4(3), 4(5), 4(6) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Forest Land Encroachment Notices Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Forest Act. Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorisation for Construction on Government Forest Land.