KAHC010408942020_1
6 Sep 2022The writ petition was filed by the management of a company engaged in the manufacture of industrial carbon and carbon brushes, classified as a hazardo...
Search Results for "standing empowered committee"
529 result(s) found
Found 529 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outcome.
3 Aug 2015The Petitioner, Saraswati Education Society’s Saraswati College of Engineering, an institution established in 1997 and offering undergraduate engine...
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Notification Including Jat Community in Central Backward Classes List as Union Cabinet Rejected NCBC Advice Without Adequate Consideration. Inclusion by Notification Dated 04.03.2014 Violates Statutory Scheme Under National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993.
1 Jan 1970The present group of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution challenged a Notification dated 04.03.2014 issued by the Union of India, whic...
- 159
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Exclusive Nomination Power of Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan Under Section 6(1)(viii) of Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Act 1956. The Court Held That the Statutory Nomination Power Vests in the Registered Society, Not in Any Faction or the State Government.
20 Aug 2020The case involves a dispute over the nomination of four members to the Board constituted under the Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalna...
- 519
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging BMC Water Charges Revision for Industrial Users — Resolution Held Valid Under Section 169 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Standing Committee's Power to Revise Water Charges Based on Consumption Upheld as Not Unconstitutional.
19 Mar 2010The petitioners, a company engaged in spinning and weaving textiles and its shareholder, challenged a resolution of the Standing Committee of the Brih...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.
18 Dec 2015These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Cancellation of Appointments of Relatives of Selection Committee Members in Shiksha Karmi Grade-III Recruitment Due to Bias and Nepotism. The selection of close relatives by the selection committee members was held to be in violation of Section 40(C) and Section 100 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993, and the appointments were rightly cancelled despite the appointees not being heard.
16 Apr 2024The case pertains to the selection and appointment of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III in Janpad Panchayat Gaurihar, District Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, in 19...
- 567
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Contractual Employees Against Municipal Corporation for Regularization and Equal Pay. Court Holds That Long-Term Contractual Workers Are Entitled to Consideration for Regularization Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
8 Aug 2024The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractual employees of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation seeking regularization of their...
- 265
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
30 Jul 2024The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...
- 456
