Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outcome.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Saraswati Education Society’s Saraswati College of Engineering, an institution established in 1997 and offering undergraduate engineering courses since 2004 and postgraduate courses since 2011, challenged the order of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) dated 30 April 2015 reducing its intake capacity by 25% for the academic year 2015‑16. The reduction came without any reasons being assigned and followed a similar reduction in the previous year, which had been set aside by the High Court in Writ Petition No. 6468 of 2014. For the current year, the college had applied online for extension of approval on 20 February 2015, and an Expert Visit Committee inspected the college on 25 March 2015. The college was called before the Standing Compliant Committee but was not provided with any inspection report or informed about the decision‐making process. The impugned order resulted in a cumulative reduction of 55% from the original intake capacity. The Petitioner contended that no deficiency had been pointed out and that the reduction was arbitrary and violative of natural justice. Respondents, including AICTE, the State Government, Directorate of Technical Education, and the University of Mumbai, resisted the petition, relying on various judgments and the AICTE Approval Process Handbook. Considering the urgency of the matter, as admissions for the academic year were underway, the High Court on 6 May 2015 granted ad‑interim relief. The Court directed the Directorate of Technical Education and the University of Mumbai to permit the Petitioner to participate in the Centralized Admission Process for all existing engineering courses as approved in the previous academic year 2014‑15. It clarified that non‑listing of the institute’s name on AICTE’s website would not affect the admission process and that the order was subject to further orders, with no equity being claimed by the Petitioner. The final disposal of the petition was scheduled for 10 June 2015.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Technical Education - AICTE Approval Process - All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 and Approval Process Handbook (2015-2016) - Interim Relief - The Petitioner Engineering College sought full intake capacity for academic year 2015-16 after AICTE reduced intake by 25% without reasons, resulting in total reduction of 55% - The High Court, noting the urgency, granted ad-interim relief directing that the Petitioner be permitted to participate in CAP admissions for all existing courses as approved in previous academic years, and clarified that non-listing on AICTE website shall not affect admission process - Held that interim protection is necessary subject to further orders, without creating any equity (Paras 6, 8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) could reduce the intake capacity of the Petitioner's engineering college without assigning reasons and without following the prescribed procedure under the Approval Process Handbook, and whether the Petitioner is entitled to full intake capacity and participation in the Centralized Admission Process (CAP) for the academic year 2015-16.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 24

WRIT PETITION NO. 4586 OF 2015

2015-08-03

Anoop V. Mohta, V. L. Achliya

Mr Rafiq Dada, Senior Advocate with Mr. C.K. Thomas for Petitioners; Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Swaraj Jadhav and Ms. Sadhana Sariputta for Respondent Nos.1 and 2; Mr. M.M. Vashi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aparna Devkar and Mr. A.I. Patel for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4; Mr. R.A. Rodrigues with Ms. Pranali Dixit for Respondent No.6

Saraswati Education Society's Saraswati College of Engineering

All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging AICTE’s reduction of intake capacity for engineering courses for academic year 2015-16 and seeking full intake capacity and participation in Centralized Admission Process (CAP).

Remedy Sought

Petitioner praying for direction to AICTE to grant extension of approval with full intake capacity, permission to participate in CAP admissions, and uploading of college name in list of eligible colleges.

Filing Reason

AICTE issued order reducing 25% intake capacity without reasons, resulting in total reduction of 55% from original capacity, and earlier similar reduction was set aside by High Court.

Previous Decisions

Earlier, in Writ Petition No. 6468/2014, the High Court had directed AICTE to grant full intake capacity for 2014-15.

Issues

Whether the reduction of intake capacity by AICTE without assigning reasons and without following due procedure under the Approval Process Handbook is valid and whether the Petitioner is entitled to full intake capacity and participation in CAP.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that no deficiency was pointed out, reduction was without reasons and in violation of natural justice, and they were entitled to full intake as per earlier court order. Respondents resisted the petition, relying on various judgments and the Handbook.

Judgment Excerpts

No reason has been given for further reduction in the intake capacity by Respondent No.1. In effect, 55% of the original intake capacity has been reduced, despite there being no deficiency pointed out by the Competent Authority in the impugned order. We direct Respondent Nos. 4 and 6 to forthwith permit the Petitioners to participate in CAP admission for all the existing Engineering courses (as was approved in the previous academic year 2013-14/2014-15) for the current academic year 2015-16.

Procedural History

Petitioner established in 1997; Engineering College started UG in 2004, PG in 2011. For 2014-15, AICTE reduced intake by 25% based on complaint; High Court in WP 6468/2014 directed full intake. For 2015-16, Petitioner applied on 20.02.2015; EVC inspection on 25.03.2015; SCC meeting on 22.04.2015; AICTE order on 30.04.2015 reducing intake by 25% without reasons. Petitioner filed WP 4586/2015 on 5.5.2015; Court granted ad-interim relief on 6.5.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
  • Societies Registration Act:
  • All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987:
  • Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Ordinance, 2015:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Engineering College to Participate in CAP Admissions Despite AICTE’s Reduction of Intake Capacity. The Court Held That the College’s Non-Listing on AICTE Website Should Not Affect Admission Process, Subject to Final Outco...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Suspicion Cannot Substitute Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Chain of Circumstances Incomplete and Key Witnesses Turned Host...