Search Results for "removal motion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "removal motion"

442 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 442 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Allowing Withdrawal of Fixed Deposits to Pay Statutory Dues in Family and Corporate Dispute. Court upholds trial court's discretion to permit defendant No.1 to liquidate company fixed deposits for payment of property tax and income tax, subject to undertaking.

28 Jun 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 11 November 2019 passed by the City Civil Court, Greater Bombay, in Notice of Motion No.1182 of 2019 in SC Suit ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the object of service of summons is to give notice, and if the defendant has already appeared and received the plaint, formal service is not required under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

21 Dec 2022

The Petitioner, Metro Ortem Ltd, a public limited company, filed a Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Lack of Proper Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that removal without affording opportunity of hearing and without proper enquiry is unsustainable.

24 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shri Jagdish Mannalalji Sancheriya, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Anji (Mothi), District Wardha in March 2019 fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party. Petitioner failed to implead newly elected Vice President despite being aware of election, rendering petition not maintainable.

20 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Yogendra Rangari, filed a writ petition challenging the legality and correctness of the Minutes of Meeting dated 12.02.2021, which rec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Challenge to Disqualification Show Cause Notices Under Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court examined allegations of natural justice violation and constitutional autonomy of local bodies, but final decision is not available in the provided excerpt.

31 Oct 2018

The petitioners, nine municipal councillors and the vice president of Beed Municipal Council, filed a writ petition before the Aurangabad Bench of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lokayukta's Rejection of Complaint Against MLAs for Alleged Offence Under Section 17(2) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 — Complaint Not Maintainable as Members of Legislative Assembly Are Not 'Public Servants' Under the Act.

5 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Adarsh R. Iyer and Prakash Babu B.K., co-presidents of Janaadhikaara Sangharsha Parishath (JSP), filed writ petitions under Articles ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

20 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against APMC President — Two-Thirds Majority of Members Present and Voting Sufficient. Section 44(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 interpreted to require support of two-thirds of members present and voting, not total membership.

9 Dec 2013

The petitioner, H M Rajappa, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Channagiri, on 01.05.2011 and subsequentl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Executor's Application for Probate in Will Dispute — Caveat Dismissed for Lack of Interest. Court held that a caveator claiming under an unproduced Will has no caveatable interest under Section 284 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

23 Aug 2013

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Daya Subhash Tiwari, the applicant and original petitioner in a probate petition, seeking dismissal of a...

2 3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)