Bombay High Court Allows Executor's Application for Probate in Will Dispute — Caveat Dismissed for Lack of Interest. Court held that a caveator claiming under an unproduced Will has no caveatable interest under Section 284 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Daya Subhash Tiwari, the applicant and original petitioner in a probate petition, seeking dismissal of a caveat filed by Mr. Lalta Prasad Ram Nihor Tiwari and for grant of probate of the Will dated 24th July, 1995 of Rajbali Ram Nihor Tiwari (the deceased). The deceased died on 21st September, 2006, a bachelor, leaving behind a Will appointing the applicant as sole executrix. The caveator, brother of the deceased, filed a caveat claiming that the deceased had executed a later Will in his favor, but did not produce or prove that Will. The court examined whether the caveator had any interest in the estate. The court noted that the caveator's claim was based on an alleged Will that was not produced, and thus he failed to show any interest. The court also considered the applicant's evidence: the Will was proved by examining one attesting witness and the scribe, who confirmed the execution and attestation. The court found the Will to be validly executed under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Consequently, the court dismissed the caveat and granted probate of the Will to the applicant. The court also directed that the applicant furnish an administration bond and pay the requisite court fees.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Caveat - Section 284 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Interest of Caveator - The caveator must have an interest in the estate of the deceased to maintain a caveat. A person claiming under a Will that is not produced or proved cannot be said to have any interest. The court held that the caveator failed to show any interest and dismissed the caveat. (Paras 10-15)

B) Succession Law - Probate - Grant of Probate - Section 276 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Proof of Will - The applicant proved the execution of the Will by examining one attesting witness and the scribe. The court found the Will to be duly executed and attested, and granted probate to the applicant. (Paras 16-20)

C) Succession Law - Will - Execution - Attestation - Section 63 Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Requirement of Two Attesting Witnesses - The Will was attested by two witnesses, one of whom was examined. The court held that the requirements of Section 63 were satisfied. (Paras 18-19)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the caveator had sufficient interest to maintain the caveat and whether the applicant is entitled to grant of probate of the Will dated 24th July, 1995.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Notice of Motion made absolute. Caveat and affidavit in support dated 5th February, 2007 filed by Mr. Lalta Prasad Ram Nihor Tiwari are dismissed. Probate of the Will dated 24th July, 1995 of Rajbali Ram Nihor Tiwari is granted to the applicant Daya Subhash Tiwari, subject to furnishing administration bond and payment of court fees.

Law Points

  • Caveat under Section 284 Indian Succession Act
  • 1925 requires caveator to have an interest in the estate
  • mere filing of a caveat without supporting evidence of interest is not sufficient
  • probate granted if Will is duly proved
  • burden on caveator to show interest
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (08) 120

Notice of Motion No. 166 of 2012 in Suit No. 13 of 2007 in Probate Petition No. 948 of 2006

2013-08-23

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr. Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate, a/w. Mr. Simil Purohit, i/b. Mr. Yogesh K. Deshpande for the Plaintiff/Applicant; Mr. D.D. Madon, Senior Advocate, a/w. Mr. K.T. Thomas, Mr. S. Joseph, i/b. M/s. Lawwell and Chartered for Respondents/Defendants.

Daya Subhash Tiwari

Kashinath Lalta Tiwari, Dilip Lalta Tiwari, Smt. Meera Sadashiv Tiwari, Smt. Maya Ramchandra Chaubey, Smt. Meenaxi Ashok Mishra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Probate petition with caveat

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks dismissal of caveat and grant of probate of Will dated 24th July, 1995

Filing Reason

Caveator claimed a later Will in his favor, but did not produce it; applicant seeks to prove the earlier Will

Issues

Whether the caveator has sufficient interest to maintain the caveat? Whether the applicant is entitled to grant of probate of the Will dated 24th July, 1995?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the caveator has no interest as he claimed under an unproduced Will and failed to show any interest. Caveator argued that he had an interest as a brother and claimed a later Will, but did not produce it.

Ratio Decidendi

A caveator must have an interest in the estate of the deceased to maintain a caveat. A person claiming under a Will that is not produced or proved cannot be said to have any interest. The applicant proved the Will by examining attesting witnesses, satisfying the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

Judgment Excerpts

The caveator has not produced any Will in support of his claim. He has not even pleaded that he has any interest in the estate of the deceased. The applicant has proved the execution of the Will by examining one of the attesting witnesses and the scribe. The Will is duly executed and attested.

Procedural History

Probate Petition No. 948 of 2006 was filed by Daya Subhash Tiwari. Caveat was filed by Lalta Prasad Ram Nihor Tiwari on 5th February, 2007. Notice of Motion No. 166 of 2012 was filed by the applicant for dismissal of caveat and grant of probate. The motion was heard and reserved on 31st July, 2013, and judgment pronounced on 23rd August, 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 63, Section 276, Section 284
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Executor's Application for Probate in Will Dispute — Caveat Dismissed for Lack of Interest. Court held that a caveator claiming under an unproduced Will has no caveatable interest under Section 284 of the Indian Succession ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Insecticide Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Invalid Complaint. The court held that the complaint was not filed by a duly authorized Insecticide Inspector and no valid sanction was obtained under ...